Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1548381 - [RFE] As a user of Satellite, I'd like to see the repository label displayed on the Red Hat Repositories page
Summary: [RFE] As a user of Satellite, I'd like to see the repository label displayed ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1339755
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Repositories
Version: 6.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-02-23 11:09 UTC by Rich Jerrido
Modified: 2021-12-10 15:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-08 18:44:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Customer Portal table of Repo names & Labels (74.75 KB, image/png)
2018-02-23 11:24 UTC, Rich Jerrido
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1548370 0 unspecified CLOSED [RFE] As a user of the 'rct' command, I'd like to see the repository Name and Label displayed as part of the cat-manifes... 2021-12-10 15:42:51 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-6973 0 None None None 2021-12-10 15:55:39 UTC

Internal Links: 1548370

Description Rich Jerrido 2018-02-23 11:09:50 UTC
Description of problem:


As a user of Satellite 6, it is difficult for me to figure out which repository needs to be synced based upon Red Hat docs. 

For example, Red Hat docs say to enable 'rhel-7-server-rpms' in order to enable/update RHEL 7 Server. To synchronize RHEL 7 Server x86_64 in Satellite, which repository (and repository set) does this correspond to? 

I can figure out that it is probably the 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server (RPMs)' repository set, but for many products, it isn't so straightforward. 

Additionally, it is trial and error. 

This RFE requests:

* exposing the repository label  visually (so on the Red Hat Repositories page, I can see that 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server (RPMs)' == rhel-7-server-rpms)
* exposing the repository label via hammer (and by extension the API). This enables me to ideally enable a repository by label alone (as they are unique across products). 

An ideal solution would be where they user can run a command similar to

hammer repository-set enable \
  --organization "$ORG" \
  --basearch='x86_64' \
  --releasever='7Server' \
  --repository-label=rhel-7-server-rpms

Comment 1 Rich Jerrido 2018-02-23 11:24:50 UTC
Created attachment 1399842 [details]
Customer Portal table of Repo names & Labels

Comment 2 Rich Jerrido 2018-02-23 11:25:37 UTC
This RFE was inspired by this discussion in the Customer portal. (https://access.redhat.com/discussions/3361601) 

As prior-art / an example of what is being requested, the attachment in Comment #1 shows existing capabilities that the Customer Portal offers.

Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2018-03-08 18:44:59 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1339755 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.