Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1550145

Summary:	[RFE] Storage profiles for Cinder volumes (Storage Quality of Service)
Product:	[oVirt] ovirt-engine	Reporter:	Konstantin Shalygin <shalygin.k>
Component:	General	Assignee:	bugs <bugs>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Avihai <aefrat>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	future	CC:	bugs, dfediuck
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Improvement, Reopened
Target Release:	---	Flags:	rule-engine: planning_ack? rule-engine: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Quality_of_Service/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-04-01 14:48:15 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Konstantin Shalygin 2018-02-28 16:01:45 UTC

Description of problem:

Currently is not possible set storage QoS to Cinder volumes.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.1.9


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. (On Web Admin) Select Storage.
2. Select Cinder storage domain.

Actual results:
'Disk profiles' tab is not present.

Expected results:
'Disk profiles' is present.

Comment 1 Doron Fediuck 2018-05-29 13:47:21 UTC

Closing older RFEs.
If relevant, please re-open and explain why.
As always, patches are welcomed!

Comment 2 Konstantin Shalygin 2018-05-29 15:24:03 UTC

Older? 3 month old.
Still need this.

Comment 3 Michal Skrivanek 2020-03-18 15:47:17 UTC

This bug didn't get any attention for a while, we didn't have the capacity to make any progress. If you deeply care about it or want to work on it please assign/target accordingly

Comment 4 Michal Skrivanek 2020-03-18 15:52:01 UTC

This bug didn't get any attention for a while, we didn't have the capacity to make any progress. If you deeply care about it or want to work on it please assign/target accordingly

Comment 5 Michal Skrivanek 2020-04-01 14:48:15 UTC

ok, closing. Please reopen if still relevant/you want to work on it.

Comment 6 Michal Skrivanek 2020-04-01 14:51:28 UTC

ok, closing. Please reopen if still relevant/you want to work on it.