RDO tickets are now tracked in Jira https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RDO/issues/
Bug 1550516 - Review Request: rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: RDO
Classification: Community
Component: Package Review
Version: trunk
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: trunk
Assignee: Matthias Runge
QA Contact: hguemar
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1505536
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-01 11:36 UTC by Martin Magr
Modified: 2019-11-12 09:47 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-12 09:47:36 UTC
Embargoed:
mrunge: rdo-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Matthias Runge 2018-03-19 11:47:12 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- gems should require rubygems package
  Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-
  profile, rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
     licenses manually.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/gems/specifications, /usr/share/gems/gems,
     /usr/share/gems/doc, /usr/share/gems
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
     independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rubygem-
     sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Ruby:
[!]: Gem should use %gem_install macro.
[x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[x]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
[x]: Test suite should not be run by rake.
[x]: Test suite of the library should be run.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-1.0.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc-1.0.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-1.0.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-1 ['1.0.0-1.el7.centos', '1.0.0-1.centos']
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-1 ['1.0.0-1.el7.centos', '1.0.0-1.centos']
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/sensu-extensions/sensu-extensions-system-profile <urlopen error [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution>
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile.noarch: W: no-documentation
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/sensu-extensions/sensu-extensions-system-profile <urlopen error [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution>
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.



Requires
--------
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    rubygem(sensu-extension)

rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile



Provides
--------
rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile:
    rubygem(sensu-extensions-system-profile)
    rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile

rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc:
    rubygem-sensu-extensions-system-profile-doc



Source checksums
----------------
https://rubygems.org/gems/sensu-extensions-system-profile-1.0.0.gem :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 929bc3320287245182da3dc78161bde8777159afa1741e761aaee3bdb501fdcf
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 929bc3320287245182da3dc78161bde8777159afa1741e761aaee3bdb501fdcf
https://github.com/sensu-extensions/sensu-extensions-system-profile/archive/v1.0.0.tar.gz#/sensu-extensions-system-profile-1.0.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : cccdd9e6ac0324ed4eadf179d6694426fd203371a143dcf2b321dcec2f4d9da9
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cccdd9e6ac0324ed4eadf179d6694426fd203371a143dcf2b321dcec2f4d9da9


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1550516 -m centos-opstools
Buildroot used: centos-7-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 2 Matthias Runge 2018-03-19 11:48:15 UTC
Please add the license file to the docs subpackage, and please take a look at requiring rubygem instead of ruby.

Comment 3 Martin Magr 2019-11-12 09:47:36 UTC
Sensu is deprecated. Closing this bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.