Bug 1550723 - please update wtforms to 2.1
Summary: please update wtforms to 2.1
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-wtforms
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Praveen Kumar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1380826
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-01 21:36 UTC by Itamar Reis Peixoto
Modified: 2018-07-08 16:44 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-08 16:44:24 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Itamar Reis Peixoto 2018-03-01 21:36:10 UTC
Description of problem:

2.1 release available at 

https://github.com/wtforms/wtforms/releases

Comment 1 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2018-04-14 21:13:35 UTC
any news about this ?

Comment 2 Joseph D. Wagner 2018-06-09 06:57:29 UTC
Fedora 28 no longer has a GUI for PostgreSQL. The GUI it used to have, pgadmin3, is not compatible with version 10, which Fedora 28 is using.

THIS REPRESENTS A LOST OF FUNCTIONALITY WITH A NEWER VERSION OF FEDORA.

To fix that, pgadmin must be upgraded to version 4. This is one of the bugs blocking it.

When can we see this resolved and pushed to Fedora 28, so that we may once again have a GUI for PostgreSQL?

Comment 3 Joseph D. Wagner 2018-06-30 08:11:19 UTC
It looks like this package hasn't been updated in 3+ years. What will it take to get this updated? It is a blocker for another bug.

Comment 4 Joseph D. Wagner 2018-07-04 21:37:29 UTC
THIS PACKAGE HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED IN FOUR YEARS, AND IT IS THE ONLY BLOCKER ON ANOTHER BUG FIX.

What will it take to get this updated? The latest version is 2.2.1.

Comment 5 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2018-07-04 22:06:16 UTC
(In reply to Joseph D. Wagner from comment #4)

pgadmin4 works with current version of wtforms, anyway I sent a pull request at.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-wtforms/pull-request/3 because it's too old.

Comment 6 Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2018-07-07 10:23:32 UTC
I don't understand why you added me to the CC here. I'm not maintaining or using this package.
And the all-caps shouting doesn't really make me want to go out of my way to help.

You can follow Fedora's unresponsive maintainer policy if you are not getting a response from the maintainer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

Or -- after you calm down -- post to the Python SIG mailing list to get more people to look at it, without singling out anyone personally.

Comment 7 Joseph D. Wagner 2018-07-08 03:57:35 UTC
Thank you Petr. You're response has been the most helpful so far, as the policy is not widely advertised. I'll follow that. Thanks for you're help.

Comment 8 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2018-07-08 16:44:24 UTC
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28083012


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.