Bug 155158 - [OOo][gcj] Can't yum update 1.9.92-2 because of libgcj-4.0.0.jar conflict in /usr/share/java
Summary: [OOo][gcj] Can't yum update 1.9.92-2 because of libgcj-4.0.0.jar conflict in ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc
Version: 4
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-04-17 09:39 UTC by Dr. Peter Boy
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.0.0-1
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-24 12:13:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dr. Peter Boy 2005-04-17 09:39:34 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de_DE; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050323 Firefox/1.0.2 Fedora/1.0.2-1.3.1

Description of problem:
If you try to upgrade on the x86_64 platform using yum you get the message:

Transaction check error: file /usr/share/java/libgcj-4.0.0.jar from install
of libgcj-4.0.0-0.42 conflicts with file from package libgcj-4.0.0-0.42

libgcj is installed as x86_64 binary, the file libgcj.so.6 and libjawt.so.6 are located in /usr/lib86.

If you try to update using rpm directly, you get the error:

Failed dependencies:
   libgcj.so.6 is needed ...
   libjawt.so.6 is needed ...

of course, because they are in /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib where OO searches

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org 1.9.92-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Install Test2 on x86_64
2.  Try to update openoffice using yum
3.
  

Actual Results:  Update failes

Expected Results:  updage should proceed

Additional info:

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2005-04-18 09:55:17 UTC
caolanm->jakub: The conflict here looks between i386 libgcj-4.0.0.jar and x86_64
libgcj-4.0.0.jar. OOo is 32bit of course and needs 32bit libgcj.

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2005-04-24 12:13:45 UTC
4.0.0-1's libgcj-4.0.0.jar is identical on all arches.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.