Bug 1553923 - Include Designate containers in RHOSP
Summary: Include Designate containers in RHOSP
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-containers
Version: 14.0 (Rocky)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: Upstream M3
: 14.0 (Rocky)
Assignee: Thierry Vignaud
QA Contact: Udi Shkalim
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-09 21:32 UTC by Ben Nemec
Modified: 2023-09-14 04:17 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-designate-api-container-14.0-1 openstack-designate-backend-bind9-container-14.0-1 openstack-designate-base-container-14.0-1 openstack-designate-central-container-14.0-1 openstack-designate-mdns-container-14.0-1 openstack-designate-producer-conta
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-01-11 11:36:30 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 544675 0 None master: MERGED tripleo-common: Add Designate containers (I6b1a77d909019cbf1f0a88daeb0fa14a07388a99) 2018-08-27 21:28:49 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 596903 0 None master: NEW kolla: designate: remove trailing continuation on RUN line (I463e7a15e096fed0b849de4122727284b0c7cfa2) 2018-08-27 21:28:44 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2019:0048 0 None None None 2019-01-11 11:36:42 UTC

Description Ben Nemec 2018-03-09 21:32:06 UTC
Description of problem: We anticipate deploying Designate with Director in OSP 14, so we will need containers for the service.  We are currently shipping Designate packages as tech preview so this should only require adding the containers themselves.  There is a patch upstream to add these containers to the TripleO set: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544675/

Comment 1 Ben Nemec 2018-07-05 19:21:06 UTC
The upstream review has been merged for a while.  Is there anything else we need to do to get them included in the downstream distribution?

Comment 2 Dan Prince 2018-07-18 20:40:33 UTC
I think new containers need LT approval before we add them into our product. Once that is approved I think the Release Engineering team would be notified to begin building the new container(s) ASAP.

Comment 6 Thomas Hervé 2018-08-06 17:22:59 UTC
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-common/blob/master/container-images/overcloud_containers.yaml#L20 contains the ones we have upstream

So all of above except pool-manager.

Comment 13 Jon Schlueter 2018-08-27 18:19:38 UTC
openstack-designate-api
openstack-designate-backend-bind9
openstack-designate-base
openstack-designate-central
openstack-designate-mdns
openstack-designate-producer
openstack-designate-sink
openstack-designate-worker

Comment 16 Jon Schlueter 2018-08-27 21:36:11 UTC
openstack-designate-api-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-backend-bind9-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-base-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-central-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-mdns-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-producer-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-sink-container-14.0-1
openstack-designate-worker-container-14.0-1

Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2019-01-11 11:36:30 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:0048

Comment 23 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 04:17:34 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.