Bug 1553985 - In offline disk migration task stuck in lock state when migrating from one iSCSI storage domain to another.
Summary: In offline disk migration task stuck in lock state when migrating from one iS...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vdsm
Version: 4.1.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.2.5
: ---
Assignee: Benny Zlotnik
QA Contact: Kevin Alon Goldblatt
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-10 12:31 UTC by vaibhav
Modified: 2021-06-10 15:23 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-03 13:11:58 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
lsvaty: testing_plan_complete-


Attachments (Terms of Use)
engine.log (17.13 MB, text/plain)
2018-03-11 08:32 UTC, vaibhav
no flags Details
VDSM.log From host hyperv04 (13.91 MB, text/plain)
2018-03-11 08:33 UTC, vaibhav
no flags Details
VDSM.log From host hyperv03 (7.01 MB, text/plain)
2018-03-11 08:35 UTC, vaibhav
no flags Details
engine and vdsm logs (662.75 KB, application/x-gzip)
2018-07-12 09:25 UTC, Kevin Alon Goldblatt
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
oVirt gerrit 90754 0 master MERGED clusterlock: Fix lease status check 2020-10-27 05:12:19 UTC
oVirt gerrit 91897 0 master MERGED clusterlock: add tests to SANLock.inquire 2020-10-27 05:12:33 UTC
oVirt gerrit 91931 0 master MERGED tests: move fakesanlock 2020-10-27 05:12:33 UTC
oVirt gerrit 92221 0 master MERGED tests: extend fakesanlock functionality 2020-10-27 05:12:18 UTC
oVirt gerrit 92725 0 ovirt-4.2 MERGED tests: move fakesanlock 2020-10-27 05:12:19 UTC
oVirt gerrit 92726 0 ovirt-4.2 MERGED tests: extend fakesanlock functionality 2020-10-27 05:12:19 UTC
oVirt gerrit 92727 0 ovirt-4.2 MERGED clusterlock: add tests to SANLock.inquire 2020-10-27 05:12:19 UTC
oVirt gerrit 92728 0 ovirt-4.2 MERGED clusterlock: Fix lease status check 2020-10-27 05:12:20 UTC

Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2018-03-11 07:52:30 UTC
vaibhav, can we get the relevant logs attached here please?

Comment 2 vaibhav 2018-03-11 08:32:03 UTC
Created attachment 1406744 [details]
engine.log

Comment 3 vaibhav 2018-03-11 08:33:58 UTC
Created attachment 1406745 [details]
VDSM.log From host hyperv04

Comment 4 vaibhav 2018-03-11 08:35:03 UTC
Created attachment 1406759 [details]
VDSM.log From host hyperv03

Comment 6 Fred Rolland 2018-03-11 09:18:35 UTC
vaibhav,
The customer reported that the disk eventually was unlocked.
Can you get the latest logs (hosts+engine) after that the disk was unlocked from the customer to understand how the process eventually finished?

Comment 14 Sandro Bonazzola 2018-06-15 11:19:02 UTC
This bug is not marked as blocker and we enetered blocker only phase for 4.2.4.
Please consider re-targeting to 4.2.5.

Comment 19 Kevin Alon Goldblatt 2018-07-12 09:25:34 UTC
Created attachment 1458299 [details]
engine and vdsm logs

Added new logs after running scenario again with longer wait before blocking the access to the storage

Comment 20 Kevin Alon Goldblatt 2018-07-12 13:44:58 UTC
Based on comment 18 and additional successful run moving to VERIFY

Comment 21 RHV bug bot 2018-07-24 12:27:11 UTC
WARN: Bug status (VERIFIED) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{'rhevm-4.2.z': '?'}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (VERIFIED) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{'rhevm-4.2.z': '?'}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 22 Marina Kalinin 2018-08-31 20:04:00 UTC
Raz / Benny,

This bug is on verified and 4.2.5 is out.
Why is this bug still open?
Who can confirm the correct status of it?

Thank you!

Comment 23 Benny Zlotnik 2018-09-02 09:55:57 UTC
(In reply to Marina from comment #22)
> Raz / Benny,
> 
> This bug is on verified and 4.2.5 is out.
> Why is this bug still open?
> Who can confirm the correct status of it?
> 
> Thank you!

I think it's a flag issue
Tal, do you know?

Comment 24 Tal Nisan 2018-09-02 14:13:15 UTC
I suspect that it's because it got in without a proper downstream clone, Anton, what can we do to rectify that?

Comment 26 Marina Kalinin 2018-09-04 18:53:17 UTC
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:2319

Comment 27 Daniel Gur 2019-08-28 13:14:21 UTC
sync2jira

Comment 28 Daniel Gur 2019-08-28 13:19:23 UTC
sync2jira


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.