Bug 1555390 – [APB] --broker flag fails if the broker route's suffix is not specified

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 1555390 - [APB] --broker flag fails if the broker route's suffix is not specified

Summary:	[APB] --broker flag fails if the broker route's suffix is not specified

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	OpenShift Container Platform
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Service Broker (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	3.7.0
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	3.7.z
Assigned To:	Dylan Murray
QA Contact:	Jian Zhang
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2018-03-14 11:20 EDT by Dylan Murray
Modified:	2018-06-27 03:59 EDT (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: The --broker flag misbehaved with improper suffixes/prefixes. Consequence: Commands like `apb list --broker <route_with_no_suffix>` did not behave as expected. Fix: Backported some newer fixes to 3.7 so that the tooling automatically will append/prepend proper suffix/prefix. Result: `apb list` should just work, --broker flag not even needed.
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-06-27 03:59:11 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2018:2009	None	None	None	2018-06-27 03:59 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Description Dylan Murray 2018-03-14 11:20:55 EDT

Description of problem:
In versions 1.0.4 and prior of the APB tooling specifying the correct broker route with the --broker flag would still fail if the user did not specify the proper suffix to the route such as:
<broker_route>/ansible-service-broker/v2/catalog

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.7.0

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. apb list --broker <broker_route_with_no_suffix>


Actual results:
Error: Attempt to list APBs in the broker returned status: 404
Unable to list APBs in Ansible Service Broker.

Expected results:
Return the list of APBs because the tooling appends the suffix for me.

Comment 1 Dylan Murray 2018-03-19 11:03:56 EDT

https://github.com/ansibleplaybookbundle/ansible-playbook-bundle/pull/245

Comment 2 David Zager 2018-03-20 13:40:02 EDT

https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/buildinfo?buildID=663785

Comment 3 Zhang Cheng 2018-04-08 01:48:32 EDT

Changing status to ON_QA since errata image ready for test.

Comment 4 Jian Zhang 2018-04-08 22:01:20 EDT

It works well as we expected, LGTM, verified.

[root@host-172-16-120-59 ~]# rpm -qa | grep apb
apb-1.0.5-1.el7.noarch

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2018-06-27 03:59:11 EDT

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2009

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.