Bug 1556041 - libhfi1: FTBFS in F28
Summary: libhfi1: FTBFS in F28
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libhfi1
Version: 28
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: dennis.dalessandro
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1550861 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: F28FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-14 23:06 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2018-07-11 21:21 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-09 08:30:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (12.68 KB, text/plain)
2018-05-28 22:30 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
root.log (81.42 KB, text/plain)
2018-05-28 22:30 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
state.log (615 bytes, text/plain)
2018-05-28 22:30 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2018-03-14 23:06:44 UTC
Your package libhfi1 failed to build from source in current F28.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24812087

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 dennis.dalessandro 2018-03-15 00:52:57 UTC
I suspect this package can be removed from Fedora. It has been obsoleted by rdma-core. What's the procedure here? What have the other RDMA/IB verbs providers done?

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2018-05-28 22:30:21 UTC
Created attachment 1444736 [details]
build.log

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2018-05-28 22:30:25 UTC
Created attachment 1444737 [details]
root.log

Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2018-05-28 22:30:28 UTC
Created attachment 1444738 [details]
state.log

Comment 5 Honggang LI 2018-06-12 00:56:46 UTC
(In reply to dennis.dalessandro from comment #1)
> I suspect this package can be removed from Fedora. It has been obsoleted by
> rdma-core. What's the procedure here? What have the other RDMA/IB verbs
> providers done?

Please retire the package and then close this bug as NOTABUG.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Comment 6 dennis.dalessandro 2018-06-28 14:03:43 UTC
So what have the other RDMA/IB providers done? Is rdma-core fully supported now?

Comment 7 dennis.dalessandro 2018-06-28 14:08:01 UTC
*** Bug 1550861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Honggang LI 2018-06-29 00:03:21 UTC
(In reply to dennis.dalessandro from comment #6)
> So what have the other RDMA/IB providers done?

Most of other RDMA/IB provides has been retired. We had opened bugs to ask them to retire the package if they did not.

> Is rdma-core fully supported now?

yes.

Comment 9 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2018-07-09 04:07:42 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in F28. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source#Package_Removal_for_Long-standing_FTBFS_bugs

Comment 10 Igor Raits 2018-07-09 08:30:59 UTC
I've retired it (hopefully).

Comment 11 dennis.dalessandro 2018-07-11 21:21:51 UTC
Thanks! I was just getting a chance to look at this bug and seen that. Appreciate it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.