Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00730408-mycrypto/mycrypto.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00730408-mycrypto/mycrypto-3.12.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: This is the second package I submit, It's pretty much an upstream fork from the other package I've made(etherwallet). There's no binary, no real dependency other than a browser. The package install the files in /usr/share/mycrypto/ and copy a .desktop file which open /usr/share/mycrypto/index.html with xdg-open. Fedora Account System Username: arsenick
- Changelog is empty - There's a license file https://github.com/MyCryptoHQ/mycrypto.com/blob/master/LICENSE that you must install with %license in %files
Thanks, changelog has been added, same for the license file. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00731472-mycrypto/mycrypto.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00731472-mycrypto/mycrypto-3.12.0-2.fc27.src.rpm I wasn't able to find the LICENSE file in the release zip and I've found I'm not using the source tarball. I'm using the .zip release which seems to be a version where gulp has already been run. So I've read the guideline regarding binary or library and I'm not sure if this fit as a binary, does it ? Should I use the source and run gulp in my specfile ?
Ok, I guess this answer my question: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript#Compilation.2FMinification I'll create a new version of the spec using the source tarball an use gulp in the %install section. If it's not necessary feel free to let me know, oterwise I'm working on it. Thanks for your help!
Use the source and use Gulp in build, then install the whole. Bump to the latest revision.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.