Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1559116 - OS::Aodh::EventAlarm resource does not exist in RHOSP 10
OS::Aodh::EventAlarm resource does not exist in RHOSP 10
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-heat (Show other bugs)
10.0 (Newton)
Unspecified Linux
high Severity low
: z9
: 10.0 (Newton)
Assigned To: Zane Bitter
Ronnie Rasouli
: Triaged, ZStream
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2018-03-21 13:44 EDT by nalmond
Modified: 2018-09-17 12:58 EDT (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openstack-heat-7.0.6-3.el7ost
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
With this enhancement, the OS::Aodh::EventAlarm Heat resource type is now included in RHEL-OSP 10. This enhancement provides a Heat interface to allow users to define alarms that can be evaluated based on events that other OpenStack services emit. For example; service update, create, or delete events.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-17 12:57:52 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:2716 None None None 2018-09-17 12:58 EDT

  None (edit)
Description nalmond 2018-03-21 13:44:06 EDT
Description of problem:
Ocata introduced a heat resource to define aodh event alarms https://docs.openstack.org/heat/latest/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Aodh::EventAlarm

This was added upstream with this commit:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381057/

Can this be backported to RHOSP 10?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always in RHOSP 10

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy RHOSP 10
2. Attempt to use OS::Aodh::EventAlarm in a heat template

Actual results:
Resource does not exist

Expected results:
Resource exists

Additional info:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1628695
Comment 1 Rabi Mishra 2018-03-22 05:57:06 EDT
We don't backport resource plugins upstream. However, if there is a compelling business reason to do so downstream only, we can consider it.
Comment 4 Zane Bitter 2018-03-27 11:33:26 EDT
No objection to this from a technical perspective. The new resource type landed relatively early in Ocata development, so nothing it depends on had been modified between Newton and Ocata.
Comment 19 Alex 2018-09-03 04:04:20 EDT
Hi there,

If this bug requires doc text for errata release, please set the 'Doc Type' and provide draft text according to the template in the 'Doc Text' field.

The documentation team will review, edit, and approve the text.

If this bug does not require doc text, please set the 'requires_doc_text' flag to -.

Thanks,
Alex
Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-17 12:57:52 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2716

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.