Bug 1559417 - Remove the provisioning namespace safely
Summary: Remove the provisioning namespace safely
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: web-admin-tendrl-node-agent
Version: rhgs-3.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.4.0
Assignee: gowtham
QA Contact: Daniel Horák
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1503137
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-22 14:01 UTC by gowtham
Modified: 2018-09-04 07:03 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tendrl-node-agent-1.6.1-3.el7rhgs
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-04 07:02:28 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github Tendrl node-agent issues 731 0 None None None 2018-03-28 16:12:59 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2616 0 None None None 2018-09-04 07:03:21 UTC

Description gowtham 2018-03-22 14:01:30 UTC
Description of problem:

The provisioner namespace in node-agent is not used for a long time, this logic is already handled by some other module, So this namespace should be removed safely without affecting the existing flow.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Martin Bukatovic 2018-03-28 08:47:04 UTC
Could you provide more details about:

* Are you asking us for a code review here?
* Link to upstream merge request.

Comment 3 gowtham 2018-03-28 16:12:59 UTC
Yes, this is also code review only, it is not related to reproducing something, In node-agent a directory called provisioning is not used for a long time. I just removed that directory and I just make sure it is not affecting any functionality.

It is a code review only

Comment 4 Martin Bukatovic 2018-03-29 08:28:59 UTC
Based on your description, I'm providing conditional qe_ack with following
assumptions:

* dev team must have done code review or sanity unit validation of
  the change described in this BZ
* qe team will verify this BZ by running general regression tests

Comment 5 gowtham 2018-03-29 08:34:43 UTC
I agree

Comment 8 Daniel Horák 2018-05-18 08:00:42 UTC
This bug is mentioning "provisioner" namespace, but linked upstream
issue and PR is about "provisioning" namespace.

Also if I read the upstream PR correctly, the "provisioner" namespace is
replacement for the "provisioning" namespace.

@gowtham, If I understand it correctly, could you please update at least the
title of this bug?

Comment 9 gowtham 2018-05-25 11:08:42 UTC
yes daniel your understanding is correct, i will change the titile to provisioning namespace

Comment 10 Daniel Horák 2018-05-28 12:32:42 UTC
The upstream PR is part of the code, no "provisioning" module is present.

# rpm -ql tendrl-node-agent | grep provisioning
# echo $?
  1

Also no relevant issue was found during testing various scenarios in the last days.

Tested and Verified with:
  tendrl-ansible-1.6.3-4.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-api-1.6.3-3.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-api-httpd-1.6.3-3.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-commons-1.6.3-5.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-grafana-plugins-1.6.3-3.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-grafana-selinux-1.5.4-2.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-monitoring-integration-1.6.3-3.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-node-agent-1.6.3-5.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-notifier-1.6.3-3.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-selinux-1.5.4-2.el7rhgs.noarch
  tendrl-ui-1.6.3-2.el7rhgs.noarch

> VERIFIED

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-04 07:02:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2616


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.