Bug 155978 - CVE-2005-1762 x86_64 sysret exception leads to DoS
CVE-2005-1762 x86_64 sysret exception leads to DoS
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
3.0
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jim Paradis
Brian Brock
impact=important,public=20050517,repo...
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks: 156320
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-04-26 08:40 EDT by Mark J. Cox (Product Security)
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-663
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-28 10:59:59 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Comment 1 Ernie Petrides 2005-05-16 17:41:25 EDT
Jim, patches relative to RHEL4 are in comments 3 and 4 of bug 154451.
Comment 8 Mark J. Cox (Product Security) 2005-06-13 05:21:17 EDT
I originally labelled this issue as CAN-2005-0756 however that was in error due
to two similar ptrace check issues.  The following is as reported to vendor-sec:

Fixing rip -> CAN-2005-1762
Fixing fs_base and gs_base -> CAN-2005-0756

[PATCH] x86_64: check if ptrace RIP is canonical
This works around an AMD Erratum.

This is a DoS on 2.4 and 2.6

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d1099e8a18960693c04507bdd7b9403db70bfd97
Comment 9 Ernie Petrides 2005-06-14 21:04:59 EDT
A fix for this problem has just been committed to the RHEL3 U6
patch pool this evening (in kernel version 2.4.21-32.8.EL).
Comment 14 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-09-28 11:00:00 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-663.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.