Bug 1562121
| Summary: | When using file driver and gnocchi is failing to mkdir, connection is not drop to redis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | David Vallee Delisle <dvd> |
| Component: | openstack-gnocchi | Assignee: | Julien Danjou <jdanjou> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sasha Smolyak <ssmolyak> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 10.0 (Newton) | CC: | amcleod, apevec, coldford, dvd, jdanjou, jjoyce, jschluet, lhh, marjones, pkilambi |
| Target Milestone: | z9 | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 10.0 (Newton) | Flags: | dvd:
needinfo+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-gnocchi-3.0.21-1.el7ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, Gnocchi attempted to create a storage directory on every startup, even if the storage directory already existed. Gnocchi failed to start if the directory creation failed.
With this update, gnocchi-upgrade creates the storage directory only once. As a result, Gnocchi starts successfully.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-17 16:59:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
David Vallee Delisle
2018-03-29 14:52:25 UTC
This does not make any sense to me for now. There should be one connection to Redis per metricd processor running, and one per metricd scheduler, that's all. The exception you see is caught handled and the lock is then released on Redis side. There's no reconnection or whatever to Redis at this point. So I'm struggling to see what the source of this might be. Are you sure that Gnocchi is the source of this? Redis is also used by e.g. Ceilometer FWIW. 3.0.21 released upstream with the fix. Need a rebase. Prad? :) Hi there, If this bug requires doc text for errata release, please set the 'Doc Type' and provide draft text according to the template in the 'Doc Text' field. The documentation team will review, edit, and approve the text. If this bug does not require doc text, please set the 'requires_doc_text' flag to -. Thanks, Alex Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2671 |