Bug 1563345
| Summary: | Resource in Failed followed by Stopped status after a node failover [rhel-7.5.z] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Oneata Mircea Teodor <toneata> |
| Component: | pacemaker | Assignee: | Ken Gaillot <kgaillot> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Marian Krcmarik <mkrcmari> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfe> |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 7.5 | CC: | abeekhof, aherr, cfeist, cluster-maint, dciabrin, kgaillot, michele, mjuricek, mkrcmari |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 7.5 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | pacemaker-1.1.18-11.el7_5.1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, Pacemaker scheduled notifications for clone actions which hadn't actually been run, but were just implied by fencing of the underlying node. In situations with a large number of such actions, these notifications led to long recovery times, saturation of the messaging mechanisms, loss of messages, and other consequential errors when using, for example, the bundle feature. Pacemaker no longer schedules notifications for implied events. As a result, recovery proceeds quickly after failure of a node hosting bundles with clone resources.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1545449 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2018-05-14 16:13:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1545449 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Oneata Mircea Teodor
2018-04-03 16:20:28 UTC
Fix 191c5be5 is in upstream 1.1 branch Test packages with the fix are available at https://people.redhat.com/kgaillot/bz1563345/ Feedback is appreciated. Hey Ken, sorry for the delay We did test the patch one day before your scratch build and that fixed our problem. We didn't re-run yet with your scratch build, but it seems at least we're good that the patch :) (In reply to Damien Ciabrini from comment #4) > Hey Ken, sorry for the delay > > We did test the patch one day before your scratch build and that fixed our > problem. We didn't re-run yet with your scratch build, but it seems at least > we're good that the patch :) My apologies, the same here, I tested the scratch build and It did fix the issue I reported. Thanks! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:1404 |