Bug 1563513 - Redundant synchronization in rename codepath for a single subvolume DHT
Summary: Redundant synchronization in rename codepath for a single subvolume DHT
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: distribute
Version: 3.12
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: bugs@gluster.org
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1563511 1572087
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-04-04 04:37 UTC by Raghavendra G
Modified: 2018-10-23 14:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1563511
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-23 14:13:58 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Raghavendra G 2018-04-04 04:37:42 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1563511 +++

Description of problem:
No synchronization is needed for a single subvolume DHT in most of the fops and DHT can act as pass through. One important codepath is rename as synchronization cost is high.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2018-04-04 00:37:04 EDT ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/19817 (cluster/dht: act as passthrough for renames on single child DHT) posted (#1) for review on master by Raghavendra G

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2018-07-05 05:54:35 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/19818 committed in release-3.12 by "jiffin tony Thottan" <jthottan> with a commit message- cluster/dht: act as passthrough for renames on single child DHT

Various synchronization present in dht_rename while handling
directories and files is necessary only if we have more than only one
child.


Change-Id: Ie21ad419125504ca2f391b1ae2e5c1d166fee247
fixes: bz#1563513
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>

Comment 2 Shyamsundar 2018-10-23 14:13:58 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.12.12, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.12.12 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-July/000105.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.