spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-4.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-4.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26167013 Description: Take control of a lone planet whose star is dying. Use your gravity beams to hurl nearby asteroids into the sun, feeding it some extra matter. While saving the star, be sure to avoid being hit by the asteroids yourself. Fedora Account System Username: suve
- Why don't you use the %cmake macro instead of: export CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" export CXXFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" cd build cmake . - You made a typo in the %changelog: 0.4.20180114git3f2aa58 → 0-4.20180114git3f2aa58 - Use either spaces or tabs, not both: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 9) Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 47 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars/review- gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-4.20180114git3f2aa58.fc29.x86_64.rpm gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-debuginfo-0-4.20180114git3f2aa58.fc29.x86_64.rpm gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-debugsource-0-4.20180114git3f2aa58.fc29.x86_64.rpm gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-4.20180114git3f2aa58.fc29.src.rpm gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.20180114git3f2aa58 ['0-4.20180114git3f2aa58.fc29', '0-4.20180114git3f2aa58'] gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars/data/DejaVuSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.1.gz gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-debugsource.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug sources for package gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars. gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 9) 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
Thanks for the review. All the remarks have been addressed. spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26196100
Ah, I've just noticed that the man page has the executable bit set. Fixed that. SPEC and SRPM remain as above. New koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26196170
Sorry for the delay, I had a tons of mails to get through. Package approved.
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d25b249b5f
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6899423456
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-811fef29b4
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d25b249b5f
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6899423456
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-811fef29b4
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.