Description of problem: Just saw $summary message in popup windows while changing view from Hosts to VMs. After clicking on butten another dialog appeared with '<something> is null' (where 'something' is a text I don't remember). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-4.2.2.6-0.1.el7.noarch How reproducible: 1 in 1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. no idea but I was changing view from Hosts (default) to VMs 2. 3. Actual results: strange popups with not end-user meaningful info Expected results: such popups should not appear Additional info:
uHe @ webadmin-0.js:19988 webadmin-0.js:19988 Tue Apr 10 13:07:18 GMT+200 2018 org.ovirt.engine.ui.frontend.Frontend SEVERE: Failed to execute runQuery: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "0].concat([7" java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "0].concat([7" at Unknown.Ts(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.bt(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.dt(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.oGf(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.new oHf(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.VEf(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.E1e(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.XHe(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.$1e(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.E0(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.T0(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.eval(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.Iu(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.Lu(webadmin-0.js) at Unknown.eval(webadmin-0.js)
Jiri, I've seen something like this before with a "bad" GWT compile. It's random and I've never figured it out. Can you see if someone else can duplicate, both on that same version and a newer one?
(In reply to Greg Sheremeta from comment #3) > Jiri, I've seen something like this before with a "bad" GWT compile. It's > random and I've never figured it out. > > Can you see if someone else can duplicate, both on that same version and a > newer one? I asked my colls, nobody has seen it.
I would wait for about a week if it returns. If not, I would close this as "wontfix" because it would take significant time to analyze what was wrong with a very small chance of success. And even if found and fixed, it would fix a very un-important/rare case with small consequences.
Please open another bug if you see something like this again. Closing per Comment 5