Bug 1565821 - Please push mc 4.8.20 to fc28
Summary: Please push mc 4.8.20 to fc28
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: mc
Version: 28
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2018-04-10 20:25 UTC by Ali Akcaagac
Modified: 2018-06-26 18:52 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2018-06-26 12:31:35 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ali Akcaagac 2018-04-10 20:25:07 UTC
I just found out that mc-4.8.20 was pushed to rawhide but fc28 still has mc-4.8.19-7.fc27 in the repositories.


Looking at the link above mc-4.8.20-2 got approved and mass-rebuild for Fedora 28 but yet it's still pointing to 4.8.19-7.fc27

Can this be reviewed and if possible cleared for arrival inside Fedora 28 ?

From what it looks like, it already received clearance from releng.


Comment 1 Tomasz Kłoczko 2018-06-26 12:31:35 UTC
Closing this ticket as it is nothing wrong with mc in f28 and mc is up-to-date in rawhide.

Comment 2 Ali Akcaagac 2018-06-26 18:52:01 UTC
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately this is not entirely true.

From the mass-rebuild as pointed out by me with above link, you will realize that the mc-4.8.20-2 version should have arrived with Fedora 28 and not the 4.8.19-7 Release (which was compiled for Fedora 27).

Of course the current version of mc 4.8.19-7 works pretty well for Fedora 28. But this was not the point. Point is that the final Fedora 28 was missing a huge load of packages due to infrastructure changes.

The issued mass rebuild therefore hasn't been received by koji and therefore the binary has never been build. I speak here about the mc 4.8.20-2 version that got issued by mass rebuild.

So I don't really understand why you close the bug as "nothing wrong with mc". The 4.8.20-2 build is still missing for Fedora 28 and I didn't talk about rawhide here.

Ater all this is not a big issue. But delivering Fedora 28 with a couple of hundrets of missing packages is indeed a worrying scenario.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.