Bug 1566585 - epoxy_glx_version & friends crash without GLX and hinder gtk3 startup [rhel-7.5.z]
Summary: epoxy_glx_version & friends crash without GLX and hinder gtk3 startup [rhel-7...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libepoxy
Version: 7.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Debarshi Ray
QA Contact: Desktop QE
Jaroslav Klech
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1566101
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-04-12 14:54 UTC by Oneata Mircea Teodor
Modified: 2018-05-14 16:11 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libepoxy-1.3.1-2.el7_5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Due to lack of support for OpenGL Extension to X Windows System (GLX) extensions, GTK+ applications terminated unexpectedly when run against certain X Server programs, such as X2Go and Xvfb. This update modifies the libepoxy library to work around the absence of GLX support. As a result, GTK+ applications start successfully when run against the mentioned X Servers.
Clone Of: 1566101
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-05-14 16:11:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:1393 0 None None None 2018-05-14 16:11:16 UTC

Description Oneata Mircea Teodor 2018-04-12 14:54:43 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #1566101 and has been proposed to be backported to 7.5 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 5 Jaroslav Klech 2018-04-19 09:43:03 UTC 
Hi Debarshi,

Please, could you provide info to document this bug in CCFR structure (cause, consequence, fix, result)?

Thank you

Jaroslav
Comment 6 Jaroslav Klech 2018-04-23 07:35:43 UTC 
Hello Debarshi,

thank you for the doc text content. I tweaked it a little bit. Could you tell me whether it is still correct content-wise, please?

Thanks 

Jaroslav
Comment 7 Debarshi Ray 2018-04-23 17:35:44 UTC 
(In reply to Jaroslav Klech from comment #6)
> thank you for the doc text content. I tweaked it a little bit. Could you
> tell me whether it is still correct content-wise, please?

Yes, looks good to me.
Comment 8 Jaroslav Klech 2018-04-30 08:15:24 UTC 
Hi Debarshi,

I have made some modifications to the doc_text. Could you, please, review it and tell me whether it is still correct content-wise?

Thank you

Jaroslav
Comment 9 Debarshi Ray 2018-05-03 15:46:29 UTC 
(In reply to Jaroslav Klech from comment #8)
> I have made some modifications to the doc_text. Could you, please, review it
> and tell me whether it is still correct content-wise?

Yes, looks good to me.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2018-05-14 16:11:10 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:1393
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.