Bug 15697 – 'SecurityPolicy' requested but not accesible

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 15697 - 'SecurityPolicy' requested but not accesible

Summary:	'SecurityPolicy' requested but not accesible

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 13685

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	XFree86 (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	high Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Preston Brown
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	Winston gold
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-08-07 23:20 EDT by Michal Jaegermann
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-08-08 15:06:31 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Michal Jaegermann 2000-08-07 23:20:30 EDT

While installing a new system the followin error shows up on a console 1:

error opening security policy file
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy

This file indeed does not exist as 'xserver' above is not a directory
but an absolute link to /etc/X11/xserver (most other links in
'.....lib/X11/' are relative, although not all).

Maybe severity here is really "low", as things are getting installed,
but I am not sure what requested that file and how it was affected.

  Michal
  michal@harddata.com

Comment 1 Glen Foster 2000-08-08 11:24:46 EDT

This defect is considered MUST-FIX for Winston Gold-release

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2000-08-08 15:04:28 EDT

This has been around since 6.1 beta (lorax) days... I can't find the bug that
was filed then no matter what fun ways I try to query bugzilla for it, but I
remember discussions of it.  The resolution was something along the lines of "we
don't put all of X in the instimage to cut down on the space, this is one of the
things that gets left out" and that since it doesn't hurt anything to mark it
not a bug.  Also resolved as NOTABUG in bug 13685.

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2000-08-14 18:52:44 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13685 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.