Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1570065 - Ansible Service Broker fails to deploy due to missing namespace argument
Ansible Service Broker fails to deploy due to missing namespace argument
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Service Broker (Show other bugs)
3.9.0
All All
high Severity high
: ---
: 3.9.z
Assigned To: Fabian von Feilitzsch
Jian Zhang
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2018-04-20 10:54 EDT by Leif Madsen
Modified: 2018-06-27 14:02 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-06-27 14:01:34 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2013 None None None 2018-06-27 14:02 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Leif Madsen 2018-04-20 10:54:36 EDT
Description of problem:

Ansible Service Broker will fail to deploy properly on OpenShift 3.9 using openshift-ansible due to a missing configuration option in the ConfigMap for the broker-config.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): v3.9 latest


How reproducible: Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. deploy service catalog and ansible service broker from openshift-ansible release-3.9
2. see po/asb-1-<random> fail due to inability to pull secret from '' namespace
3.

Actual results:

Fails to deploy due to missing namespace argument.

Expected results:

Deploy without error :)


Additional info:

PR in upstream available at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/8063
Comment 1 John Matthews 2018-04-26 18:09:20 EDT
Fabian,

Please ensure this is fixed in 3.10, I saw the PR was submitted for release-3.9, unsure if we need another change in master as well.
Comment 2 Fabian von Feilitzsch 2018-04-27 08:47:28 EDT
This is already fixed in 3.10, it was just never backported to 3.9 until pr#8063. Going to realign to 3.9.z and set status to ON_QA since the change has been merged into the release 3.9 branch.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2018-06-27 14:01:34 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2013

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.