Description of problem: Errata Task Force has asked to start using advisory names with out the revision in all of the errata tool. I will create a new field called 'advisory_name' that will be in the form RH(B|A|E)-XXXX:XXX{X} without the revision number. That way 'fulladvisory' can be slowly phased out with the next live push and use 'advisory_name' and 'revision' instead to figure out the identity of the errata push.
Also several other fields have changed as well. references -> reference type -> errata_type cross -> cross ref I have implemented some hacks to still send the old fields properly as well but I would like to move away from them if possible since they are keywords in PgSQL that are not allowed. Dave
We don't display cross at all in RHN currently. Fixed in rhns-4.0.0-53 and newer, and changing QA owner to dkl.
Haven't heard any complaints from dkl in 2.5 months, so PROD_READY this baby.
No complaints from this end so far.