RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1578381 - Error message need update when specify numa distance with node index >=128
Summary: Error message need update when specify numa distance with node index >=128
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm-rhev
Version: 7.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Igor Mammedov
QA Contact: Yumei Huang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-05-15 12:44 UTC by Yumei Huang
Modified: 2018-11-08 08:21 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.12.0-7.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-01 11:09:52 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Yumei Huang 2018-05-15 12:44:58 UTC
Description of problem:
Boot guest with CLI "-numa dist,src=128,dst=1,val=20", the error message is:

qemu-kvm: -numa dist,src=128,dst=1,val=20: Invalid node 128, max possible could be 128

Which is kind of contradict.

The max index should be 127. The error message need update.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
qemu-kvm-rhev-2.12.0-1.el7
kernel-3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot guest
# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -m 24G -smp 16 rhel76-64-virtio-scsi.qcow2 \
-netdev tap,id=tap0 -device virtio-net-pci,id=net0,netdev=tap0 \
-vnc :1 -monitor stdio \
-numa node,nodeid=0 \
-numa node,nodeid=1 \
-numa dist,src=128,dst=1,val=20
2.
3.

Actual results:
QEMU quits with error message:
(qemu) qemu-kvm: -numa dist,src=128,dst=1,val=20: Invalid node 128, max possible could be 128


Expected results:
Error message shows the correct max value or the range.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Igor Mammedov 2018-07-02 13:59:05 UTC
Posted:
"[RHEL-7.6 qemu-kvm-rhev PATCH] numa: clarify error message when node index is out of range in -numa dist, ..."

Comment 4 Miroslav Rezanina 2018-07-04 08:31:03 UTC
Fix included in qemu-kvm-rhev-2.12.0-7.el7

Comment 6 Yumei Huang 2018-07-05 05:05:32 UTC
Verify:
qemu-kvm-rhev-2.12.0-7.el7

# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 -numa dist,src=128,dst=1,val=20
qemu-kvm: -numa dist,src=128,dst=1,val=20: Parameter 'src' expects an integer between 0 and 127


# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 -numa dist,src=1,dst=128,val=20
qemu-kvm: -numa dist,src=1,dst=128,val=20: Parameter 'dst' expects an integer between 0 and 127

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2018-11-01 11:09:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3443


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.