Bug 1578590 – [OVS] [qede] Got ERR when configuring OVS-dpdk with qede NIC

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 1578590 - [OVS] [qede] Got ERR when configuring OVS-dpdk with qede NIC

Summary:	[OVS] [qede] Got ERR when configuring OVS-dpdk with qede NIC

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	openvswitch (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.5
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	high Severity high
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Timothy Redaelli
QA Contact:	Jean-Tsung Hsiao
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2018-05-15 19:44 EDT by Jean-Tsung Hsiao
Modified:	2018-06-21 09:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	11 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	openvswitch-2.9.0-45.el7fdn
Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-06-21 09:36:35 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Potential fix (2.65 KB, patch) 2018-05-17 01:33 EDT, Rasesh Mody	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2018:1962	None	None	None	2018-06-21 09:37 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2018-05-15 19:44:12 EDT

Description of problem: [OVS] [qede] Got ERR when configuring OVS-dpdk with qede NIC

2018-05-15T23:29:57.396Z|00170|dpdk|ERR|[qede_ucast_filter:681(85:00.0:dpdk-port-1)]Unicast MAC is already added with vlan = 0, vni = 0
2018-05-15T23:29:57.396Z|00171|dpdk|ERR|[qede_mac_int_ops:816(85:00.0:dpdk-port-1)]MAC filter failed, rc = -17, op = 1

[root@netqe9 jhsiao]# vs
5d023537-fac3-46fe-9af4-cee010d6bc24
    Bridge "ovsbr0"
        Port "dpdk-11"
            Interface "dpdk-11"
                type: dpdk
                options: {dpdk-devargs="0000:85:00.1", n_rxq="2"}
        Port "ovsbr0"
            Interface "ovsbr0"
                type: internal
        Port "dpdk-10"
            Interface "dpdk-10"
                type: dpdk
                options: {dpdk-devargs="0000:85:00.0", n_rxq="2"}
    ovs_version: "2.9.0"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@netqe9 jhsiao]# uname -a
Linux netqe9.knqe.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 21 18:14:51 EDT 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@netqe9 jhsiao]# rpm -q openvswitch
openvswitch-2.9.0-36.el7fdp.x86_64

How reproducible: Reproducible


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have a qede installed: FastLinQ QL45212H 25GbE Adapter 
2. Config a OVS-dpdk with qede
3. Check /var/log/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log

Actual results: Got ERRs


Expected results: Should not get ERRs


Additional info:

Comment 2 Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2018-05-16 10:13:34 EDT

NOTE: The network traffic has been flowing well over qede dpdk interfaces. So, not sure what will be the impact of the the ERR.

Comment 3 Rasesh Mody 2018-05-17 01:33 EDT

Created attachment 1437751 [details]
Potential fix

Comment 4 Christian Trautman 2018-05-17 12:37:38 EDT

Hi Rasesh,

If we provide the src rpm could you build us a test kit with your fix to check it?

Comment 5 Rasesh Mody 2018-05-17 19:05:25 EDT

Hi Christian - sure, we can provide a custom test kit.

Comment 8 Rasesh Mody 2018-06-05 16:26:44 EDT

The test build provided with fix, it was tested by Jean and it was verified issue is fixed. 

We have submitted the fix to dpdk.org and marked for inclusion in stable. It has been accepted upstream.

Thanks!
-Rasesh

Comment 11 Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2018-06-18 19:54:53 EDT

The fix of this BZ has been verified with OVS 2.9.0-47.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2018-06-21 09:36:35 EDT

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:1962

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.