Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1579039 - Pool create cmd's expected_num_objects is not properly interpreted
Pool create cmd's expected_num_objects is not properly interpreted
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RADOS (Show other bugs)
3.0
x86_64 All
high Severity high
: z4
: 3.0
Assigned To: Josh Durgin
Parikshith
:
Depends On: 1554963
Blocks: 1554970
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2018-05-16 16:59 EDT by Mike Hackett
Modified: 2018-07-11 14:11 EDT (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-12.2.4-15.el7cp Ubuntu: 12.2.4-19redhat1xenial
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, when using the "pool create" command with "expected_num_objects", placement group (PG) directories were not pre-created at pool creation time as expected, resulting in performance drops when filestore splitting occurred. With this update, the "expected_num_objects" parameter is now passed through to filestore correctly, and PG directories for the expected number of objects are pre-created at pool creation time.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1554963
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-11 14:11:11 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 22530 None None None 2018-05-16 16:59 EDT
Github ceph/ceph/pull/20907 None None None 2018-05-16 17:21 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2177 None None None 2018-07-11 14:11 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2018-07-11 14:11:11 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2177

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.