Bug 1581407 - Package Review: python-jaraco-packaging - Tools to supplement packaging Python releases
Summary: Package Review: python-jaraco-packaging - Tools to supplement packaging Pytho...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthias Runge
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1581406 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1581404
Blocks: 1411746
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-05-22 16:57 UTC by Dan Radez
Modified: 2019-04-09 00:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-09 00:48:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
mrunge: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Radez 2018-05-22 16:57:58 UTC
python-jaraco-packaging is a dependency of python-cheroot which is a dependency of python-cherrypy-15. This is one of a few new dependencies to get python-cherrypy and python3-cherrypy up to latest version.

https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-jaraco-packaging-5.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-jaraco-packaging.spec

$ rpmlint python-jaraco-packaging-5.1-1.fc28.src.rpm python-jaraco-packaging.spec 
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 1 Dan Radez 2018-05-22 17:13:22 UTC
*** Bug 1581406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2019-02-25 23:07:41 UTC
Thanks Dan. I would like to update CherryPy as well.

Would you please make this package Python 3-only, update to the latest upstream (6.1), and then I can review it?

You may want to update your pyp2rpm version as well. The latest version generates much less boilerplate.

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2019-02-25 23:38:08 UTC
Looks like this package only provides some miscellaneous utilities for developing with setuptools interactively, so it's not strictly necessary to build the latest CherryPy version.

Comment 4 Dan Radez 2019-04-02 14:01:07 UTC
sry, been distracted from this for a while. I'll get an update posted.

Comment 6 Matthias Runge 2019-04-03 16:13:59 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: BUILDSTDERR: warning: File listed twice: /usr/bin/upload-package
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_duplicate_files


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 23 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/mrunge/review/1581407-python-jaraco-packaging/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
     guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.4.14 starting (python version = 3.7.3)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux disabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 1.4.14
INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.14
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /home/mrunge/review/1581407-python-jaraco-packaging/results/python-jaraco-packaging-6.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 31 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=False install /home/mrunge/review/1581407-python-jaraco-packaging/results/python-jaraco-packaging-6.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-jaraco-packaging-6.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          python-jaraco-packaging-6.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
python-jaraco-packaging.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dependency-tree
python-jaraco-packaging.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary upload-package
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/j/jaraco.packaging/jaraco.packaging-6.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 75d6360662ede4405981814bf68a67a4e83d0d943504ee1c7a698d01a7cd357e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 75d6360662ede4405981814bf68a67a4e83d0d943504ee1c7a698d01a7cd357e


Requires
--------
python-jaraco-packaging (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    python(abi)
    python3-rst-linker
    python3-setuptools
    python3-six
    python3.7dist(setuptools)
    python3.7dist(six)



Provides
--------
python-jaraco-packaging:
    python-jaraco-packaging
    python3.7dist(jaraco.packaging)
    python3dist(jaraco.packaging)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.1 (9643194) last change: 2019-03-21
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1581407
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, PHP, R, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, Perl, C/C++, fonts
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH



One nit: %{_bindir}/upload-package is listed twice in %files. That can be removed during import

Package approved.

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-04-03 19:16:47 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jaraco-packaging


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.