Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1582225

Summary:	.operations indices were created without any replicas
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Peter Portante <pportant>
Component:	Logging	Assignee:	Jeff Cantrill <jcantril>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Anping Li <anli>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	3.7.0	CC:	aos-bugs, jcantril, pportant, rmeggins
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	OpsBlocker
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-05-25 01:29:54 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Peter Portante 2018-05-24 15:08:09 UTC

On a 3.7 dedicated cluster, the .operations.* indices were not configured to have any replica shards.

Reviewing the code, it appears the REPLICA_SHARDS environment variable is not being set.

Comment 1 Jeff Cantrill 2018-05-24 17:25:49 UTC

Do we need this bug given the 'fix' is not attached to an errata yet? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582225

Comment 2 Peter Portante 2018-05-24 17:36:15 UTC

Not sure what you mean.  Are you saying there is already a fix?

Comment 3 Jeff Cantrill 2018-05-24 17:47:12 UTC

Yes.  Reference the bz from #c1.  It's in modified awaiting to be moved along by RCM

Comment 4 Peter Portante 2018-05-25 01:12:36 UTC

Isn't the BZ in comment 1 the same URL as this BZ?

Comment 5 Jeff Cantrill 2018-05-25 01:29:09 UTC

Should have been: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552977

Comment 6 Jeff Cantrill 2018-05-25 01:29:54 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1552977 ***

Comment 7 Peter Portante 2018-05-25 01:37:20 UTC

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552977#c5, which is the comment making this BZ a duplicate.  The fix is talked about in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552977#c7.