I think this might be specific to the "Summary & Name Matched" section, but the packages are sorted oddly. Observe: root@seton:/ FEDORA # dnf search chroot Última comprobación de caducidad de metadatos hecha hace 0:45:44, el vie 25 may 2018 19:31:14 UTC. ================================ Coincidencia en Resumen, Nombre: chroot ================================ fakechroot-libs.i686 : Libraries of fakechroot fakechroot-libs.x86_64 : Libraries of fakechroot fakechroot.x86_64 : Gives a fake chroot environment schroot.x86_64 : Execute commands in a chroot environment schroot-debugsource.x86_64 : Debug sources for package schroot schroot-debuginfo.x86_64 : Debug information for package schroot fakechroot-debugsource.i686 : Debug sources for package fakechroot fakechroot-debugsource.x86_64 : Debug sources for package fakechroot linux-user-chroot.x86_64 : Helper program for calling chroot(2) as non-root fakechroot-libs-debuginfo.i686 : Debug information for package fakechroot-libs fakechroot-libs-debuginfo.x86_64 : Debug information for package fakechroot-libs linux-user-chroot-debugsource.x86_64 : Debug sources for package linux-user-chroot linux-user-chroot-debuginfo.x86_64 : Debug information for package linux-user-chroot bind-chroot.x86_64 : A chroot runtime environment for the ISC BIND DNS server, named(8) bind-sdb-chroot.x86_64 : A chroot runtime environment for the ISC BIND DNS server, named-sdb(8) ==================================== Coincidencia en Resumen: chroot ==================================== mach.i686 : Make a chroot mach.x86_64 : Make a chroot mock.noarch : Builds packages inside chroots mock-core-configs.noarch : Mock core config files basic chroots I would have expected (and think it would be much more easy to read) if it were instead sorted alphabetically. Thanks!
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'.
It looks like that the search is ordered not by length of message, but by percentage occurrence in text. I tested it with "dnf search a" and you can see the pattern. I believe that the current ordering system is more preferable, because more relevant information is on the top. Anyway thanks a lot for your report.
I think most users will find this behavior surprising and would expect it to be sorted alphabetically. In particular, this is a behavior regression from `yum`, which absolutely sorted alphabetically. It's also in direct contrast to what other distros do - e.g., `apt`.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 29 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 29 on 2019-11-26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '29'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 29 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32.
I believe this is fixed in following PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1610
*** Bug 1811461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
FEDORA-2020-a943fde9ba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a943fde9ba
FEDORA-2020-f3f7292b39 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f3f7292b39
FEDORA-2020-f3f7292b39 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f3f7292b39` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f3f7292b39 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-a943fde9ba has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a943fde9ba` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a943fde9ba See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-a943fde9ba has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2020-f3f7292b39 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.