Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1583462 - Sharding sends all application sent fsyncs to the main shard file [NEEDINFO]
Sharding sends all application sent fsyncs to the main shard file
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sharding (Show other bugs)
3.3
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: RHGS 3.3.1 Async
Assigned To: Krutika Dhananjay
SATHEESARAN
: ZStream
Depends On: 1468483 1493085
Blocks: 1523608 1585104
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2018-05-29 00:55 EDT by Sunil Kumar Acharya
Modified: 2018-07-19 02:09 EDT (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.4-54.12
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, when an application sent fsync on a sharded file, the shards associated with the file were not being synced to disk. Hence, potentially causing data loss in case of a plain distribute shard volume. This update fixes the shard translator by syncing all the modified shards to disk whenever the application sends an fsync.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1493085
: 1585104 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-19 02:00:07 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
nchilaka: needinfo? (sasundar)


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:2222 None None None 2018-07-19 02:01 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 4 Atin Mukherjee 2018-06-25 08:54:31 EDT
Krutika - Can you please provide doc text for this bug?
Comment 5 SATHEESARAN 2018-07-05 09:18:10 EDT
Tested with glusterfs-3.8.4-54.13.el7rhgs with the following steps:

1. Created few VMs with their images on the distribute volume
2. Started all the VMs and installed OS on them.
3. Triggered lot of fsyncs inside the VM
4. Ran I/O inside them for few hours

There were no issues seen.
Comment 7 Nithya Balachandran 2018-07-17 02:07:04 EDT
Not the requestee but the doc text seems a little too technical. I do not understand the impact of not having this fix in the code to the end user.
Were distribute volumes supported in earlier releases? If not, perhaps the doc text is not required at all.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2018-07-19 02:00:07 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2222

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.