Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 158439
advancecomp - FC4 x86_64 rebuild failed
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:11:06 EST
This package failed to rebuild on x86_64 for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11
after an automated release bump. No build logs available afaics.
Please request a rebuild.
Jeremy rebuilt it.
thias, I don't think just closing this (and several other bugs) is very helpfull
before the build succeed. I (we?) wanted to use these bug as trackers for the
current state of extras and what is missing.
At least we do so for the i386 bugs and I planed something like that for x86_64
also -- okay, maybe I should have choosen my words "Please request a rebuild."
more carefully. Something like "please rebuild and fix this package if it is
still broken" would be better. But by saying "Jeremy rebuilt it." this bu is
IMHO not fixed until the build succeed.
Sure, but Jeremy asked for those rebuilds, and only he will get the
failed/succeeded emails anyway.
The thing is, of all the bugs you've opened, all packages should succeed (from
what I've seen), except some for which bugs are already open (i.e. csmash)...
which apparently you didn't check (?). Jeremy said he'd open bugs for any failed
rebuilds... which will probably be faster and more efficient than searching for
open bugs for each package anyway, and have the same end result : If I get a bug
assigned to me, I take care of it.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sure, but Jeremy asked for those rebuilds, and only he will get the
> failed/succeeded emails anyway.
Well Jeremys work and my overlapped here a bit :-| That's life...
> The thing is, of all the bugs you've opened, all packages should succeed (from
> what I've seen),
advancecomp does not build here on FC4T3; We'll see if the buildsystem succeeds
> except some for which bugs are already open (i.e. csmash)...
> which apparently you didn't check (?).
I did check, but I'm only human and make errors ;-)
Reopening; Build Failed:
I opened a bug report upstream (not logged in, don't know why) :
Fixed and built as -4
Thanks. Ralf suggested a cleaner approach to the change, which I've applied and
it is now built as 1.14-5 :-)