Bug 158444 - cone - FC4 x86_64 rebuild failed
cone - FC4 x86_64 rebuild failed
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cone (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Steven Pritchard
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: FE4Target-x86_64
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-05-22 08:32 EDT by Thorsten Leemhuis
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 0.64-5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-06-02 19:03:59 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-05-22 08:32:33 EDT
This package failed to rebuild on x86_64 for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11
after an automated release bump. No build logs available afaics.

Please request a rebuild.
Comment 1 Steven Pritchard 2005-05-26 22:23:00 EDT
I just noticed on fedora-extras-commits that Jeremy Katz beat me to it.  I've
been trying to find some time to get my x86_64 test box updated to rawhide to
try a test build here, but I suppose now I may not have to.
Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2005-05-27 20:19:25 EDT
So the build failed (again), but this time we have a build log.


Scanning quickly through the build log, the failures seem to be from missing files.

Compiling maildirkeywords4.cpp
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include
                 from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include
                 from maildirkeywords.h:435,
                 from maildirkeywords4.cpp:9:
gobase.h:64:28: error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory

For a moment I thought perhaps cone.spec was missing an explicit BuildRequires:
libstdc++-devel, but it is there, so I'm confused...

I have my FC4t3/x86_64 test box up now, so I'll try a build there as soon as I
get it updated to rawhide.
Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-05-27 21:32:02 EDT
No, this is a known x86_64 build system problem. libstdc++-devel 32-bit and
64-bit replacing eachother. It has been discussed before, on extras-list most
likely (I think related to "octave" build failure).
Comment 4 Steven Pritchard 2005-05-28 11:20:08 EDT
Ah, right, I remember that now.

So is there a better workaround than to just keep re-submitting the build
request until it succeeds?
Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2005-06-02 14:31:47 EDT
I believe the trick is to not specify the redundant Buildrequires
libstdc++-devel gcc-c++. With that, the build attempt did succeed:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.