Bug 1584464 - conflicts between packages texlive-fontools and texlive-dvips
Summary: conflicts between packages texlive-fontools and texlive-dvips
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: texlive
Version: 28
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-05-31 01:28 UTC by Need Real Name
Modified: 2019-05-28 20:42 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-28 20:42:04 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
output of 'dnf update' (200.83 KB, text/plain)
2018-06-01 22:18 UTC, Need Real Name
no flags Details

Description Need Real Name 2018-05-31 01:28:32 UTC
Description of problem:
Recently when upgrading packages on a Fedora 28 system I got the following error:
file /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/fontools/fontools_ot1.enc from install of texlive-fontools-7:20170520-29.fc28.noarch conflicts with file from package texlive-dvips-6:svn41149-42.fc28.2.noarch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
texlive-fontools-7:20170520-29.fc28.noarch
texlive-dvips-6:svn41149-42.fc28.2.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2018-06-01 13:40:01 UTC
Hmmmm. How did you manage that one... texlive-base generates both texlive-fontools and texlive-dvips subpackages:

texlive-fontools-20170520-29.fc28.noarch.rpm
texlive-dvips-20170520-29.fc28.x86_64.rpm

But only one of them is showing up in your transaction (texlive-fontools). Can you show me the full output of dnf upgrade ?

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2018-06-01 22:18:10 UTC
Created attachment 1446873 [details]
output of 'dnf update'

I've just noticed that the problem was caused by dependency on tetex-dvips of the legacy package CJK-4.6.0-3.x86_64.

I've also noticed that texlive-base no longer provides the symbolic link /usr/share/texlive/texmf-local/texmf-compat -> /usr/share/texmf, which breaks quite a few legacy packages that I'm always using.

It would be okay for me if the problems above are not to be fixed due to new policies or compatibility requirements in the new TeXLive distribution. I can either update my legacy packages accordingly or replace them with more up-to-date ones.

Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2018-06-13 20:36:12 UTC
I think everything should be fixed up now by the texlive/texlive-base in updates-testing. Please let me know if it is not.

Comment 4 Need Real Name 2018-06-19 05:41:39 UTC
I can confirm everything reported here has been fixed with the packages in updates-testing. Many thanks for the quick fix.

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2019-05-02 21:33:35 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 28 is nearing its end of life.
On 2019-May-28 Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for
Fedora 28. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases
that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as
EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '28'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 28 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 6 Ben Cotton 2019-05-28 20:42:04 UTC
Fedora 28 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-05-28. Fedora 28 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.