RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1585201 - The python version shipping with RHE7 is miscompiled
Summary: The python version shipping with RHE7 is miscompiled
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: python
Version: 7.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Victor Stinner
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-06-01 13:43 UTC by Piyush Bhoot
Modified: 2021-12-10 16:17 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-16 12:37:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pbhoot: needinfo-


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Python 34814 0 None None None 2018-09-26 17:10:32 UTC

Description Piyush Bhoot 2018-06-01 13:43:19 UTC
Description of problem:

RedHat's version of _struct.so fails to link against libpython2.7 despite requiring symbols defined by it, i.e. it has been linked incorrectly, leaving symbols unresolved.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
python-2.7.5-68.el7.x86_64
python-libs-2.7.5-68.el7.x86_64


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
pythontest.c:
#include <dlfcn.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    void *pylib = dlopen("libpython2.7.so.1.0", RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_NOW);
    void (*Py_Initialize)(void) = dlsym(pylib, "Py_Initialize");
    Py_Initialize();
    int (*PyRun_SimpleStringFlags)(const char *, void *) = dlsym(pylib, "PyRun_SimpleStringFlags");
    PyRun_SimpleStringFlags("import json\n", 0);
    return 0;
}

2. Compile with "gcc -Wall -o pythontest pythontest.c -ldl -g"

3. Run ./pythontest -

Actual results:

it will fail with ImportError: /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/_struct.so: undefined symbol: PyFloat_Type

Expected results:
No error

Additional info:
(optionally) change RTLD_LOCAL to RTLD_GLOBAL and see that it works, indicating that python fails to ensure the symbols it needs are actually available in the appropriate symbol namespace

- Reproducer code runs proper with arm python same version 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/arm/tools/python/python/2.7.5/rhe7-x86_64/lib/ and see that it works (no errors printed)

Comment 2 Victor Stinner 2018-08-02 15:07:14 UTC
I compiled Python 2.7 manually on Fedora 28 using:

   ./configure --enable-shared --prefix=/opt/py27shared
   make install

Using that, _struct.so is correctly linked to libpython:

$ ldd /opt/py27shared/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_struct.so 
	libpython2.7.so.1.0 => /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0 (0x00007f399179f000)
	...

It's not the case for the _struct.so installed by python2-libs-2.7.15-2.fc28.x86_64:

$ ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/_struct.so
	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff414e1000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fb8de363000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb8ddfa4000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb8de78e000)

I looked at x86_64 build logs of python2-2.7.15-7.el8+7. C compiler flags look fine...

gcc
 -DNDEBUG
 -D_GNU_SOURCE
 -I .
 -I /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-2.7.15/Include
 -I Include
 -O2
 -Wall
 -Werror=format-security
 -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
 -c /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-2.7.15/Modules/_struct.c
 -fPIC
 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
 -fcf-protection
 -fexceptions
 -fno-strict-aliasing
 -fstack-clash-protection
 -fstack-protector-strong
 -fwrapv
 -g
 -grecord-gcc-switches
 -m64
 -mtune=generic
 -o Modules/_struct.o
 -pipe
 -pthread
 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1
 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1

... but the linker uses "-Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro" which can explain the missing libpython dependency on the .so file:

gcc
 -Wl,-z,now
 -Wl,-z,relro
 -pthread
 -shared
 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
 Modules/_struct.o
 -o Modules/_struct.so

Comment 4 Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2018-08-22 13:22:57 UTC
Python modules such as _struct should link to libpython2.7.so.1.0. That they don't is a bug.


However, I don't think the reproducer (loading libpython2.7.so.1.0 with RTLD_LOCAL) should be expected to work.
For reference, from `man dlopen`:

  RTLD_LOCAL
   This is the converse of RTLD_GLOBAL, and the default if neither flag is speci‐
   fied.  Symbols defined in this shared object are not made available to resolve
   references in subsequently loaded shared objects.

Python modules (including internal ones) can't work without symbols from libpython2.7.so, and generally expect that Python is loaded before they are imported.

What's the use case behind loading libpython2.7.so with RTLD_LOCAL?

Comment 5 Victor Stinner 2018-08-31 15:26:03 UTC
If I understood correctly, the root issue is the -Wl,-z,now flag passed to LDFLAGS when the _struct.so dynamic module of Python is built (I'm not 100% sure).

Comment 7 Victor Stinner 2018-09-26 17:10:32 UTC
Oh, I think that I identified the root issue. The RPM package modifies Python 2.7 build system to ask to compile some C extensions like _struct using Makefile as a shared library. Sadly, there is a bug in Python: with such configuration, the generated shared library is not linked to libpython2.7.

I reported the bug upstream and I proposed a pull request to fix it:
https://bugs.python.org/issue34814

Comment 8 Victor Stinner 2018-10-16 12:37:56 UTC
According to the discussion at Python upstream ( https://bugs.python.org/issue34814 ), C extensions should not be linked to libpython, and the dynamic linker should find symbols needed by C extensions in the current process. It seems that you must use RTLD_GLOBAL to load libpython for your use case.

Loading libpython with RTLD_LOCAL is not supported in Python. If you really want to use RTLD_LOCAL, you should modify Python to build the extensions that you need as builtin modules rather than extensions (.so libraries). But I'm not sure that it's doable for all C extensions of CPython.

I close the bug is "not a bug" since RTLD_LOCAL doesn't work by design: it's a deliberate choice of Python upstream.

Comment 9 Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2018-10-16 14:20:42 UTC
Also, why does the customer need to link with RTLD_LOCAL?
Can we help with the underlying use case?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.