Bug 158821 - Advanced server 3 ARP timeout messages
Summary: Advanced server 3 ARP timeout messages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: John W. Linville
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 168424
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-05-26 02:20 UTC by Issue Tracker
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHSA-2006-0144
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-15 16:00:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
jwltest-arp_announce.patch (4.96 KB, patch)
2005-06-30 14:23 UTC, John W. Linville 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2006:0144 0 qe-ready SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Updated kernel packages available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Update 7 2006-03-15 05:00:00 UTC

Description Issue Tracker 2005-05-26 02:20:52 UTC 
Escalated to Bugzilla from IssueTracker
Comment 3 Marty Wesley 2005-05-26 06:37:19 UTC 
PM ACK for U6
Comment 5 John W. Linville 2005-06-03 20:36:11 UTC 
Test kernels available here: 
 
   http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/rhel3/ 
 
Please give 'em a try and post the results here...thanks!
Comment 8 John W. Linville 2005-06-30 14:21:36 UTC 
Definitely want (or need?) some customer feedback if this is going to get 
in...
Comment 9 John W. Linville 2005-06-30 14:23:25 UTC 
Created attachment 116171 [details]
jwltest-arp_announce.patch

The relevant patch from the kernels in question...
Comment 10 John W. Linville 2005-07-08 17:51:21 UTC 
I'd really like to hear some test results...?
Comment 12 John W. Linville 2005-07-18 13:33:11 UTC 
It has been pointed-out that this breaks kABI for RHEL3, so it will _not_ go 
in without some major rework...
Comment 13 John W. Linville 2005-07-18 14:28:26 UTC 
Would a global (i.e. _NOT_ per interface) setting be acceptable?
Comment 15 Ernie Petrides 2005-09-13 03:22:26 UTC 
A fix for this problem has just been committed to the RHEL3 U7
patch pool this evening (in kernel version 2.4.21-37.1.EL).
Comment 19 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-03-15 16:00:59 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0144.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.