Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1588731

Summary:	Bucket lifecycles stick around after buckets are deleted
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Orit Wasserman <owasserm>
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Erin Donnelly <edonnell>
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.0	CC:	anharris, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, edonnell, igreen, kbader, kdreyer, kjosy, mbenjamin, pasik, sweil, tchandra
Target Milestone:	z1	Keywords:	TestOnly
Target Release:	3.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHEL: ceph-12.2.8-3.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.8-3redhat1	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.Stale lifecycle configuration data of deleted buckets no longer persists in `OMAP` consuming space Previously, in the Ceph Object Gateway (RGW), incorrect key formatting in the `RGWDeleteLC::execute()`function caused bucket lifecycle configuration metadata to persist after the deletion of the corresponding bucket. This caused stale lifecycle configuration data to persist in `OMAP` consuming space. With this update, the correct name for the lifecycle object is now used in `RGWDeleteLC::execute()`, and the lifecycle configuration is removed as expected on removal of the corresponding bucket.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-03-07 15:50:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1629656

Description Orit Wasserman 2018-06-07 18:41:56 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2. 
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 5 Karun Josy 2018-11-09 04:38:31 UTC

Hi Matt,

When we were testing bucket lifecycle policies related to a case opened by a customer, we hit the same bug.

As far as I understand this bug is resolved and backported in Upstream.
Can you let me know when this will be available in downstream?

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2019-03-07 15:50:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0475