RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1589144 - shadowWarning is not generated if passwordWarning is lower than 86400 seconds (1 day).
Summary: shadowWarning is not generated if passwordWarning is lower than 86400 seconds...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 7.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 7.7
Assignee: thierry bordaz
QA Contact: RHDS QE
Marc Muehlfeld
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-06-08 13:34 UTC by Têko Mihinto
Modified: 2021-09-09 14:29 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.3.9.1-2.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Directory Server did not return the `shadowWarning` attribute if `passwordWarning` was set lower than `86400` Previously, Directory Server did not return the `shadowWarning` attribute in searches if the `passwordWarning` attribute in the `cn=config` entry was set to a value lower than `86400` seconds (1 day). This update fixes the problem. As a result, the server returns the value of the `shadowWarning` attribute in the mentioned scenario.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-08-06 12:58:23 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 3150 0 None None None 2020-09-13 22:17:15 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2019:2152 0 None None None 2019-08-06 12:58:42 UTC

Description Têko Mihinto 2018-06-08 13:34:03 UTC 
Description of problem:

The attribute shadowWarning is not returned if the passwordWarning value is lower than 86400 seconds (1 day).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

# rpm -qa | grep 389-ds-base-
389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.3.7.5-18.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-1.3.7.5-13.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-libs-1.3.7.5-13.el7.x86_64
#

How reproducible:

Always.


Steps to Reproduce:

1. Set the passwordWarning value to 86400 or higher:

# ldapsearch -xLLL  -p <PORT> -h <HOST> -b "cn=config" -D"cn=Directory Manager" -W -sbase passwordWarning
Enter LDAP Password:
dn: cn=config
passwordWarning: 86400

#

A search will return the shadowWarning attribute:
# ldapsearch -xLLL  -p <PORT> -h <HOST> -b "ou=People,o=Test" -D"cn=Directory Manager" -W  "uid=tmorris" shadowWarning
Enter LDAP Password:
dn: uid=tmorris,ou=People,o=Test
shadowWarning: 1

#

2. Set the passwordWarning value lower than 86400:
#  ldapmodify -x -D"cn=Directory Manager" -W -p <PORT> -h <HOST>
Enter LDAP Password:
dn: cn=config
changetype: modify
replace: passwordWarning
passwordWarning: 86399

modifying entry "cn=config"

#

No value for is returned for shadowWarning:
# ldapsearch -xLLL  -p <PORT> -h <HOST> -b "ou=People,o=Test" -D"cn=Directory Manager" -W  "uid=tmorris" shadowWarning
Enter LDAP Password:
dn: uid=tmorris,ou=People,o=Test

#


Actual results:

shadowWarning is only generated if the passwordWarning value is higher or equal to 1 day.

Expected results:
shadowWarning should be returned as long as passwordWarning is defined.


Additional info:
Comment 3 thierry bordaz 2018-06-08 14:06:58 UTC 
IMHO it makes sense to send a warning as long as the administrator defined a no null passwordWarning (even if it is less than a day).

It should be the same for all kind of accounts (including ShadowAccount)
Comment 4 Viktor Ashirov 2018-12-14 14:07:19 UTC 
Upstream ticket:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50091
Comment 5 thierry bordaz 2018-12-14 16:58:54 UTC 
Ticket pushed upstream -> POST
Comment 7 bsmejkal 2019-03-06 11:53:20 UTC 
Bug is still reproducible.

=============================================================================================== test session starts ===============================================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.6.3, pytest-4.3.0, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.9.0 -- /opt/rh/rh-python36/root/usr/bin/python3
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.6.3', 'Platform': 'Linux-3.10.0-1010.el7.x86_64-x86_64-with-redhat-7.7-Maipo', 'Packages': {'pytest': '4.3.0', 'py': '1.8.0', 'pluggy': '0.9.0'}, 'Plugins': {'metadata': '1.8.0', 'html': '1.20.0'}}
389-ds-base: 1.3.9.1-1.el7
nss: 3.36.0-7.1.el7_6
nspr: 4.19.0-1.el7_5
openldap: 2.4.44-21.el7_6
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.26-23.el7
FIPS: disabled
rootdir: /mnt/tests/rhds/tests/upstream/ds/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password, inifile:
plugins: metadata-1.8.0, html-1.20.0
collected 12 items / 11 deselected / 1 selected                                                                                                                                                                   

pwdPolicy_warning_test.py::test_search_shadowWarning_when_passwordWarning_is_lower FAILED                                                                              [100%]
========================================================================== 1 failed, 11 deselected in 10.64 seconds ==========================================================================
Comment 8 bsmejkal 2019-03-18 15:55:51 UTC 
=============================================================================================== test session starts ===============================================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.6.3, pytest-4.3.1, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.9.0 -- /opt/rh/rh-python36/root/usr/bin/python3
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.6.3', 'Platform': 'Linux-3.10.0-1020.el7.x86_64-x86_64-with-redhat-7.7-Maipo', 'Packages': {'pytest': '4.3.1', 'py': '1.8.0', 'pluggy': '0.9.0'}, 'Plugins': {'metadata': '1.8.0', 'html': '1.20.0'}}
389-ds-base: 1.3.9.1-2.el7
nss: 3.36.0-7.1.el7_6
nspr: 4.19.0-1.el7_5
openldap: 2.4.44-21.el7_6
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.26-23.el7
FIPS: disabled
rootdir: /mnt/tests/rhds/tests/upstream/ds/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password, inifile:
plugins: metadata-1.8.0, html-1.20.0
collected 12 items / 11 deselected / 1 selected                                                                                                                                                                   

pwdPolicy_warning_test.py::test_search_shadowWarning_when_passwordWarning_is_lower PASSED                                                                                                                   [100%]
============================================================================== 1 passed, 11 deselected in 10.65 seconds ===============================================================================
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2019-08-06 12:58:23 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2152
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.