Description of problem: The current python-novaclient version in OSP13 (queens) is the same than OSP12 (pike) and doesn't reflect the upstream release [1]. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OSP13 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install python-novaclient Actual results: # rpm -q python-novaclient python-novaclient-9.1.1-1.el7ost.noarch Expected results: python-novaclient should be at least 10.x (10.1.0 is the latest) Additional info: [1] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/nova.html#team-queens-python-novaclient
Until recently (2018-06-04), upstream was also shipping the same python-novaclient version 9.1.1 for pike *and* queens because of a problem where python-openstackclient (queens) could not work with python-novaclient 10.1.0 (intended queens) because python-novaclient had removed some methods python-openstackclient was calling. Recently, the situation upstream was fixed in a series of changes [1][2][3] involving a backport to python-openstackclient, a new release of python-openstackclient, and a constraint bump for python-novaclient. With those changes, python-novaclient 10.1.0 became the version to ship with queens. The fixes landed after OSP13 was already locked down in preparation for release, so it was decided not to bump to the newer version 10.1.0 at the last minute and instead wait for a z-stream release. [1] https://review.openstack.org/562840 [2] https://review.openstack.org/571537 [3] https://review.openstack.org/571540
This bug is marked for inclusion in the errata but does not currently contain draft documentation text. To ensure the timely release of this advisory please provide draft documentation text for this bug as soon as possible. If you do not think this bug requires errata documentation, set the requires_doc_text flag to "-". To add draft documentation text: * Select the documentation type from the "Doc Type" drop down field. * A template will be provided in the "Doc Text" field based on the "Doc Type" value selected. Enter draft text in the "Doc Text" field.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2588
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days