Bug 159128 – monitor probe succeeds on i386, fails on x86_64

Bug 159128 - monitor probe succeeds on i386, fails on x86_64

Summary:	monitor probe succeeds on i386, fails on x86_64

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	anaconda (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	4
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Anaconda Maintenance Team
QA Contact:	Mike McLean
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-05-30 07:42 EDT by Dan Hollis
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-05-30 23:11:13 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Dan Hollis 2005-05-30 07:42:37 EDT

Description of problem:
FC4T3 i386 correctly probes monitor. FC4T3 x86_64 on exact same machine fails.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Run i386 installer. Probing for monitor type: PHILIPS 107S
2.Run x86_64 installer. Probing for monitor type: Unknown
3.Profit!
  
Actual results:
x86_64 installer is unable to probe monitor. while i386 installer on exact same
machine works fine.

Expected results:
You would expect x86_64 to be able to probe.

Additional info:
Video card - GF4 440mx.
Monitor - Philips 107S

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2005-05-30 23:11:13 EDT

This is because the real mode monitor probing we do can only be done on i386 and
not x86_64.  Unfortunately, there's no generic, cross-platform way to do monitor
probing and the methods that do exist are all card-specific.  X has code for
doing this, but doesn't really export it in a way that can be used.  There's
another (old) bug for tracking fixing that at which point we can do something
better.

Comment 2 Dan Hollis 2005-05-30 23:56:17 EDT

what's the bug number for tracking it? might be nice to make 159128 'depends on' it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.