Description of problem: The version this is built from hasn't had an update in many years. As a result it's not aware of any of the configuration tuning since PG9.1 Looking at the github network graph https://github.com/gregs1104/pgtune/network The most active fork appears to be https://github.com/iterativo-git/pgtune which indeed has a pg_settings for 9.6 which is a lot more recent!
Created attachment 1452564 [details] Update to "active" fork Here's a patch to update it to the more active fork.
I agree with change to more active fork. Why remove the requires of postgresql-server?
Because I couldn't recall if things like the upstream PGDG package or the SCL packages provide that and I don't think it is technically required, as it just acts on a postgresql.conf file regardless of where that comes from. If you prefer to leave it I don't think it'd hurt anything but I don't think it is technically a requirement.
OK. I can flip it to Recommends.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'.
I retired this packages. Here is a copy sent to devel: I want to retire pgtune https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pgtune The original upstream is dead and python2 only: https://github.com/gregs1104/pgtune There is a new upstream based on the original version: https://github.com/le0pard/pgtune But it is far from being simple. It is made in ruby and node.js. And I do not want to maintain it. Additionally is no more command line tool, but web service, which is available online as well: https://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/#/ If you want to take overtake this package - not sure why - then please contact me. Otherwise, I will retire this package.