Description of problem:
It appears your package depend on 'initscrits' package for some reason. However, most of the initscripts' dependants are no longer valid.
I hereby request you check your package/specfile, and either:
* drop the initscripts dependancy and close this BZ, or
* provide a justification in a comment for keeping the dependancy (without closing this BZ)
NOTE: In case you are depending on initscripts because of networking scripts, then you will need to update your specfile to depend directly on new package 'network-scripts' (instead of 'initscripts').
If this is the case, please let us know in the comments and do not close the BZ yet.
The requested change here is valid for Rawhide (F29) only. Do not backport these changes into F28 or F27, because it would break things.
Thank you for your co-operation! :)
-- Dee'Kej --
This is a false positive.
The wine package has sections for RHEL 6 (EPEL 6) to ship a sysvinit script. This script is not shipped in Fedora or EPEL 7.
Besides, no where in the package is there a BR or Requires for initscripts. Not sure what you are reporting here to begin with.
that's certainly strange. I haven't checked your specfile yet, but when I list the dependants of initscripts, I get this:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires initscripts | grep wine
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:15 ago on Mon 18 Jun 2018 11:23:19 EDT.
I'll check your specfile tomorrow, to see what's going on there... :)
(In reply to David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] from comment #2)
> that's certainly strange. I haven't checked your specfile yet, but when I
> list the dependants of initscripts, I get this:
> $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires initscripts | grep wine
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:15 ago on Mon 18 Jun 2018 11:23:19 EDT.
Thanks. That helps. There were two Requires outside of the EPEL6 block that I have moved into the correct block:
Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service
Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service
Thanks a lot for your co-operation, much appreciated! ;)
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle.
Changing version to '29'.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 29 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 29 on 2019-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '29'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 29 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 29 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-11-26. Fedora 29 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.