Bug 159324 - libswt3-gtk2 broken softlink and missing bugzilla
libswt3-gtk2 broken softlink and missing bugzilla
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eclipse (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Andrew Overholt
Depends On:
Blocks: 159880
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-06-01 13:19 EDT by John Ellson
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.4
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-12-03 11:09:32 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description John Ellson 2005-06-01 13:19:20 EDT
Description of problem:
There is no entry in bugzilla for libswt3-gtk2 so I'll try reporting this
against eclipse. Rpm installs a broken softlink:
  /usr/share/java/swt-gtk-3.1.0_fc.jar ->

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install from rpm
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2005-06-06 11:10:05 EDT
Hmm.  The relevant line from the specfile is this:

ln -sf

Maybe %{eclipse_arch} isn't being set up properly on x86_64?
Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2005-12-02 15:35:03 EST
Is this still an issue?
Comment 3 John Ellson 2005-12-02 20:22:09 EST
The boken softlink has been fixed.

There is still no bugzilla entry for libswt*
Comment 4 Andrew Overholt 2005-12-03 11:09:32 EST

I don't think there will ever be an entry for libswt* because it's a sub-package
of the Eclipse SRPM and I'm pretty sure that entries are for SRPMs only.  You
could file a bug against the Bugzilla component if you'd like to see this
changed but I'm pretty sure it's automated.

Comment 5 Igor Foox 2006-03-15 11:51:36 EST
(In reply to comment #1)
>Hmm.  The relevant line from the specfile is this:
>ln -sf
>Maybe %{eclipse_arch} isn't being set up properly on x86_64?

Wow, nice.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.