Bug 1595283
| Summary: | [Backport] osd: eternal stuck PG in 'unfound_recovery' http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24373 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Mike Hackett <mhackett> |
| Component: | RADOS | Assignee: | Josh Durgin <jdurgin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vasishta <vashastr> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 2.5 | CC: | ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, dzafman, edonnell, jdurgin, kchai, mamccoma, tchandra, tserlin, vumrao |
| Target Milestone: | z2 | ||
| Target Release: | 2.5 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-10.2.10-37.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.10-32redhat1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Under some circumstances placement groups (PGs) could become stuck in the "recovery_unfound" state when a copy of the data was available after an OSD was marked down and then up. To fix this issue, OSDs reset peering when they are marked down and then up, and PGs no longer get stuck in the "recovery_unfound" state.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-05 19:39:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Mike Hackett
2018-06-26 13:34:07 UTC
Hi, Followed steps mentioned in description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24373 Observed that PGs weren't stuck in unfound_recovery and working fine. Moving to VERIFIED state. Regards, Vasishta shastry QE, Ceph Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2651 |