Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1597540

Summary: tests/geo-rep: Add test cases for rsnapshot use case
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Kotresh HR <khiremat>
Component: testsAssignee: Kotresh HR <khiremat>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-5.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-23 15:12:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kotresh HR 2018-07-03 07:53:32 UTC
Description of problem:

Following use cases doesn't have test case

1. rsnapshot creates a I/O pattern which involves
       create, rename, symlink, hardlink in specific
       order.
    
2. Hardlink rename on master with source unlinked use case

Please add the test case for the same.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mainline



E

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2018-07-03 08:00:06 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/20449 (tests/geo-rep: Add rsnapshot and hardlink rename test case) posted (#1) for review on master by Kotresh HR

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2018-07-13 07:36:56 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/20449 committed in master by "Amar Tumballi" <amarts> with a commit message- tests/geo-rep: Add rsnapshot and hardlink rename test case

1. rsnapshot creates a I/O pattern which involves
   create, rename, symlink, hardlink in specific
   order.

2. Hardlink rename on master with source unlinked use case

fixes: bz#1597540
Change-Id: Iedade47e5bf9905424a974df6ec33bc6f6695082
Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat>

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2018-10-23 15:12:54 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-5.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-5.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-October/000115.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/