Meta data based repository check revealed an inconsistency: a powerpc build of libvisual 0.2.0-3 packages is missing.
i386: 0.2.0-3 built successfully on April 7th, but now fails to build on i386 as 0.2.0-3.fc4 (successful on ppc/x86_64): http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/4/libvisual/0.2.0-3/i386/libvisual-0.2.0-3.failure.log
libvisual build fine for me, and it seems to be included in the repo : http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/libvisual-0.2.0-3.i386.rpm http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/ppc/libvisual-0.2.0-2.ppc.rpm http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/x86_64/libvisual-0.2.0-3.x86_64.rpm
Please see comment #1. Version 0.2.0-3 does not build with gcc-4.0.0-8 on i386, because one file wants -mmmx or so. Further, powerpc arch only has 0.2.0-2.pcc not 0.2.0-3.pcc
The following patch to libvisual.spec file works for me (I was having exact same problem with libvisual-plugins) %build +%ifarch i386 +export CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -mmmx" +%endif %configure make %{?_smp_mflags}
I included the fix, thanks. Version 0.2.0-6 seems to be correctly propagated on all archs, closing bug.