+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1306727 +++ Description of problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244328 was about all overcloud nodes having the same initiatorname post-deployment. This is resolved for compute nodes, but all other nodes (controller, ceph, swift, cinder) still have the same initiatornames. This is not a problem in a vanilla setup the way we use it, but will pose a problem if additional drives are added to these hosts via iscsi later on. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [stack@instack ~]$ rpm -qa |grep tripleo openstack-tripleo-image-elements-0.9.6-10.el7ost.noarch openstack-tripleo-common-0.0.1.dev6-6.git49b57eb.el7ost.noarch openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.6-119.el7ost.noarch openstack-tripleo-puppet-elements-0.0.1-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-tripleo-0.0.7-0.1.1664e566.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: Always [stack@instack ~]$ nova list +--------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------+------------+-------------+---------------------+ | ID | Name | Status | Task State | Power State | Networks | +--------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------+------------+-------------+---------------------+ | fe8c1d14-d63b-442e-91b8-a6c68f1214ce | overcloud-cephstorage-0 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.0.2.7 | | 44344478-0866-40f4-9a27-a9fa84343119 | overcloud-compute-0 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.0.2.11 | | 69335882-c373-4956-9823-47d95cd1ed4b | overcloud-compute-1 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.0.2.9 | | 3c691e1a-6a7e-48f1-bb28-fc2b7e953d15 | overcloud-controller-0 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.0.2.12 | | abd350f8-54e2-420f-9e3e-d7f4081ed51c | overcloud-controller-1 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.0.2.10 | | 58483250-538b-4bdb-861b-f7cc98f7d08d | overcloud-controller-2 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.0.2.8 | +--------------------------------------+-------------------------+--------+------------+-------------+---------------------+ [stack@instack ~]$ for i in `nova list|grep ctlplane|cut -d"=" -f2 |cut -d' ' -f1`; do echo $i; ssh heat-admin@$i cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi; done 192.0.2.7 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:9d4e9e8d8fe 192.0.2.11 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:8950acdea36 192.0.2.9 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:7c3107a5d62 192.0.2.12 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:9d4e9e8d8fe 192.0.2.10 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:9d4e9e8d8fe 192.0.2.8 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:9d4e9e8d8fe
Verified on: puppet-tripleo-5.6.8-15.el7ost.noarch Using a preinstalled none HA system, as can be seen each node has a unique initiatorname [stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ nova list +--------------------------------------+--------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------------------+ | ID | Name | Status | Task State | Power State | Networks | +--------------------------------------+--------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------------------+ | ab9196a9-e749-439a-b1c4-2ec3e80f9987 | ceph-0 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.168.24.8 | | 68ecfaf8-1914-4402-bdf1-a87e89207e98 | compute-0 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.168.24.13 | | 67800ed3-d27b-4510-9262-83d1bd1750ce | controller-0 | ACTIVE | - | Running | ctlplane=192.168.24.10 | +--------------------------------------+--------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------------------+ [stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ for i in `nova list|grep ctlplane|cut -d"=" -f2 |cut -d' ' -f1`; do echo $i; ssh heat-admin@$i cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi; done 192.168.24.8 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:62f05d2d527f 192.168.24.13 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:60a939123 192.168.24.10 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:4b6a62dbbffe Checked again on another deployment, same puppet version, this time HA but without ceph, again all nodes have unique initiator names. for i in `nova list|grep ctlplane|cut -d"=" -f2 |cut -d' ' -f1`; do echo $i; ssh heat-admin@$i cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi; done 192.168.24.13 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:b561b3b97b47 192.168.24.11 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:78f83527fe0 192.168.24.15 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:4e9d77958d2b 192.168.24.8 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:3d69e4e6dd 192.168.24.7 InitiatorName=iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:5b36aea878d6 Based on these two systems OK to verify.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2670