Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1601958

Summary: seinfo cannot resolve dccp portcons
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component: setoolsAssignee: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.6CC: lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, plautrba, vmojzis
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-30 09:36:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
example policy.conf file
none
Setools3 patch fixing support for DCCP portcon none

Description Milos Malik 2018-07-17 14:42:04 UTC
Description of problem:
 * if policy contains a portcon definition with DCCP port then seinfo --portcon fails to show it

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
checkpolicy-2.5-7.el7.x86_64
setools-3.3.8-3.el7.x86_64
setools-console-3.3.8-3.el7.x86_64
setools-gui-3.3.8-3.el7.x86_64
setools-libs-3.3.8-3.el7.x86_64
setools-libs-tcl-3.3.8-3.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
 * always

Steps to Reproduce:
# grep dccp policy.conf.from.secilc 
portcon dccp 1025 system_u:system_r:bin_t:s0:c0 - s1:c0,c1
# checkpolicy -M -o policy.out policy.conf.from.secilc 
checkpolicy:  loading policy configuration from policy.conf.from.secilc
checkpolicy:  policy configuration loaded
checkpolicy:  writing binary representation (version 31) to policy.out
# ls -l policy.out 
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4685 Jul 17 10:38 policy.out
# seinfo --portcon ./policy.out 

Portcon: 3
	portcon tcp 22 system_u:system_r:bin_t:s0:c0 - s1:c0.c1
	portcon udp 25 system_u:system_r:bin_t:s0:c0 - s1:c0.c1
ERROR: Could not get protocol string.
	(null)
# 

Additional information:
 * the same scenario works as expected on Fedora 28 (tested with setools 4.2)

Comment 1 Milos Malik 2018-07-17 14:44:09 UTC
Created attachment 1459439 [details]
example policy.conf file

Comment 2 Vit Mojzis 2018-07-23 14:13:08 UTC
Created attachment 1469968 [details]
Setools3 patch fixing support for DCCP portcon

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2018-10-30 09:36:15 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3091