Bug 1602119 - Some old issues may be experimented due to the availability of an old packaged release – Documentation lacks accuracy
Summary: Some old issues may be experimented due to the availability of an old package...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: e2fsprogs
Version: 28
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lukáš Czerner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-07-17 20:27 UTC by ricky.tigg
Modified: 2019-04-18 22:19 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: e2fsprogs-1.44.6-1.fc29
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-18 22:19:33 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description ricky.tigg 2018-07-17 20:27:15 UTC
Description of problem: some old issues may be experimented due to the availability of an old packaged release (January 1, 2018). Documentation lacks accuracy regarding some units specifications.

Version-Release number of component: e2fsprogs.x86_64 1.43.8-2.fc28

Actual results: no specification at all regarding units megabytes and gigabytes.

Expected results: latest release availability –v. 1.44.3 (July 10, 2018)–, 
 how are they defined – e.g according to power-of-2 –?

Additional info – man page – RESIZE2FS(8):
'the size parameter may be suffixed by one of (...) the units designators: 's', 'K', 'M', or 'G', for 512 byte sectors, kilobytes, megabytes, or gigabytes, respectively.'

'when kilobytes is used (...), I mean (...) power-of-2 kilobytes (...)'.

Comment 1 Lukáš Czerner 2018-07-18 06:47:41 UTC
Hi,

the whole paragraph is as follows


Note: when kilobytes is used above, I mean real, power-of-2 kilobytes, (i.e., 1024 bytes), which some politically correct folks insist should be the stupid-sounding ``kibibytes''.
       The same holds true for megabytes, also sometimes known as ``mebibytes'', or gigabytes, as the amazingly silly ``gibibytes''.  Makes you want to gibber, doesn't it?


I remember Ted really not liking the mebi-gibi siliness and he likes to let people know ;) However I am not sure what's not clear about it ?

> Actual results: no specification at all regarding units megabytes and gigabytes.

The documentation clearly specifies megabytes and gigabytes in the next sentence.

-Lukas

Comment 2 ricky.tigg 2018-07-18 11:07:17 UTC
That just What I aimed to avoid to display; that indeed what is readable.

Does then 'mean real'  – ISO 80000 or IEC 80000, international standard  – apply to 'The same holds true for megabytes(...) or gigabytes'?

Documentation will become at last specific and why not in clear English with no place for fantasy comments, when mention regarding the standard that units observe is provided – e.g. ISO/IEC 80000 standard –.

Comment 3 Lukáš Czerner 2018-07-18 11:47:47 UTC
While I do understand that the wording is a bit "conversational", I do not think there is any confusion about what it means. It clearly says it's power-of-2.

But I'll work upstream to rephrase it.

Thanks!
-Lukas

Comment 4 ricky.tigg 2018-07-18 12:20:07 UTC
Power-of-2; indeed regarding the developer's – maintainer or whoever is in charge of the project– own 'kilobytes', which are here meant as 'real'. Though from that side we are just users. So according to your interpretation, all the others units should be understood as observing power-of-2 as well. Am I correct?

Comment 5 Lukáš Czerner 2018-07-19 08:56:17 UTC
Yes, it's not just kilobytes, but megabytes, gigabytes and terabytes as well.

-Lukas

Comment 6 ricky.tigg 2018-07-19 12:16:24 UTC
That's what I suspected: these appellations would have to be reinterpreted in order to get the correct meanings which appeared at last to be that 'Power-of-2' is currently meant for 'powers of 1024' (Clause 4 of the Standard SO/IEC 80000 defines standard binary prefixes used to denote powers of 1024 e.g.as 1024^1 (kibi-).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-04-04 05:43:31 UTC
e2fsprogs-1.44.6-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b4207428d3

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-04-05 03:25:56 UTC
e2fsprogs-1.44.6-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b4207428d3

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2019-04-18 22:19:33 UTC
e2fsprogs-1.44.6-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.