Description of problem: With Russian being introduced in the upcoming U2, could you please update the package with the latest Russian translation when you rebuild the package? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): evolution-data-server-1.0.2-7.i386.rpm How reproducible: Always
In the event where upstream translation is not 100%, we would attempt to complete it in-house. Bringing Sarah to co-ordinate on this.
I have noticed that strings that have been translated in .po file did not get picked up by the application. Hence, the string still display in english. The strace did not show that the evolution-data-server.mo gets read. Double check with rawhide, the same issue does not occur. Should I file as a separate bug? #: addressbook/libebook/e-contact.c:135 msgid "Mobile Phone" msgstr "ÐобилÑнÑй ÑелеÑон"
Created attachment 117176 [details] Attached is the full translation of evolution-data-server-1.0.2.po.
Is that a better translation? The original ru.po in the file seems to contain numerous additional strings.
Created attachment 117208 [details] diff from original ru.po to the attachment 117167 [details] Appears to have lost numerous translations. Or am I misreading this?
On 2nd reading, appears that the "lost" translations relate to strings in the evolution package, from the time when evolut-data-server was part of the evolution package.
Built with new translations as evolution-data-server-1.0.2-8
evolution-data-server is 100% translated in gnome-2-8 branch of gnome cvs. It was not necessary to use other translation. just cvs co -r gnome-2-8.
Building with latest from CVS on gnome-2-8 branch (ru.po version 1.21.2.1) as evolution-data-server-1.0.2-9
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2005-616.html