Bug 1608027 - [Sat6.4] Sorting of available minor version repositories is not consistent on new Red Hat Repositories page
Summary: [Sat6.4] Sorting of available minor version repositories is not consistent on...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Repositories
Version: 6.4
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: 6.4.0
Assignee: Michael Johnson
QA Contact: Stephen Wadeley
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-07-24 19:12 UTC by Ashish Humbe
Modified: 2023-09-14 04:32 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tfm-rubygem-katello-3.7.0.31-1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-16 19:32:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 24679 0 Normal Closed [Sat6.4] Sorting of available minor version repositories is not consistent on new Red Hat Repositories page 2020-11-30 14:49:52 UTC
Github Katello katello pull 7690 0 None closed Fixes #24679 - Sorting repos Red Hat repos page 2020-11-30 14:49:52 UTC

Description Ashish Humbe 2018-07-24 19:12:20 UTC 
Description of problem:

Sorting of available minor version repos is not consistent. 

 Example: When we look for "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server (RPMs)" repos we see "x86_64 7Server" as a first entry. Whereas when we look for "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server (RPMs)" repos then we see "x86_64 6Server" as the last entry and the sorting is like: 

i386 6.1
x86_64 6.1
x86_64 6.10    <<<<  After 6.1 we should see 6.2 instead of 6.10 
i386 6.10
i386 6.2
x86_64 6.2
i386 6.3
...
...
...
x86_64 6Server
i386 6Server

6Server or 7Server are base repositories and these are most commonly used repos so those should be listed as a first entry.
Comment 2 jalviso 2018-07-31 05:27:51 UTC 
In this example, 7Server is listed at the top but the sorting is still disordered:

Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 7.0 director for RHEL 7 (RPMs)
rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0-director-rpms
x86_64 7Server
x86_64 7.2
x86_64 7.3
x86_64 7.0
x86_64 7.1
x86_64 7.4
x86_64 7.5
Comment 9 Walden Raines 2018-08-22 08:35:11 UTC 
Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24679 from this bug
Comment 10 Satellite Program 2018-09-10 20:04:40 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to micjohns
Comment 11 Satellite Program 2018-09-10 20:04:44 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to micjohns
Comment 12 Satellite Program 2018-09-20 16:04:37 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24679 has been resolved.
Comment 13 Patrick Creech 2018-09-21 01:30:30 UTC 
Michael,

This failed cherrypick downstream.  Can you take a look?
Comment 14 Jonathon Turel 2018-09-21 14:27:05 UTC 
Hello Ashish,

Here's what you can expect from the sorting now: repositories will be sorted in descending order, grouped by architecture. Also, any non y-stream repo (ie 7Server) will be moved to the top as we want to encourage use of those rather than y-stream repositories.

Something like this:

x86_64 6Server
i386 6Server
x86_64 6.10
x86_64 6.9
....
i386 6.10
i386 6.9
Comment 15 Ashish Humbe 2018-09-21 17:37:34 UTC 
Thank you Johathon for the update and considering this for GA.
Comment 17 Patrick Creech 2018-09-24 14:45:30 UTC 
snap 23, not 63
Comment 20 Bryan Kearney 2018-10-16 19:32:29 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927
Comment 21 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 04:32:02 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.